Letters RSS Feed


Majority oppose hunting

NO amount of warm words or photographs of cute children with beautiful hounds (Oxford Mail, December 27) can dilute the strong feeling of revulsion felt by the majority of the population towards those who participate and revel in the cruel reality of foxhunting.

No nonsense about there needing to be some sort of fox control, as claimed by Richard Sumner of the Heythrop Hunt, can mask the truth – hunting is an appallingly cruel medieval sport, favoured by a cruel minority.

Please stop romanticising a disgraceful activity, enjoyed by the few with mindsets stuck in the past.

Hunting has nothing to do with control or conservation but has everything to do with making sport out of the pursuit of a beautiful animal for as far and as long as possible and then glorying in its gory evisceration when it can run no further.

What an ignominious end to the life of a native animal that would, if permitted, control its own numbers, while humans, in contrast, seem currently hell-bent on consigning our beautiful but fragile world to extinction by their disinclination to limit their numbers to any meaningful degree.

Banning hunting was a moral victory for the majority of the electorate. Those who seek to overturn the ban should be treated to the contempt which they deserve.

BEA BRADLEY, Cuxham Road, Watlington

Comments(3)

Tiger1ily says...
5:42pm Thu 5 Jan 12

You have strong views and you are entitled to them, but why do you say that the majority of the electorate agrees? Most people don't have strong objections to fox-hunting and anyone who is a farmer or anyone who just keeps a few hens in their back yard regards foxes as a form of nasty vermin that frankly need to be kept down.
The break into chicken coops and tear the birds limb from limb - it's not a pretty sight!

Tiger1ily says...
1:57pm Sat 7 Jan 12

When you look closely at Bea Bradley's message it does betray some rather nasty attitudes - she thinks anyone who disagrees with her deserves "contempt". Really? And how exactly does she propose to make people "limit their numbers to any meaningful degree"? What policies is she advocating - maybe the sort that prevail in China where you need permission to have a child and the State can force you to have an abortion? Or maybe complusory castration? So long as foxes have rights nothing else seems to matter much to her.

Phian says...
11:52pm Sun 8 Jan 12

How DARE Bea Bradley claim to speak for the majority of people in this country, she certainly does not speak for me.
I have no interest in Fox Hunting and suspect that most people, if truly honest, don't really care. As I say, I suspect it but would never claim it to be so without a 100% poll.
Had there been a referendum with every voter taking part I wouldn't be at all surprised if the "don't know" column was larger than the "yes" and "no" added together.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree