Public to have say on renaming town

The Old Anchor Inn in Abingdon The Old Anchor Inn in Abingdon

A MOVE to change Abingdon’s name back to Abingdon-on-Thames has moved a significant step closer but the public will get their say.

The Tory town council has approved the plan despite it being labelled “pretentious” by a former mayor.

The council rejected a proposal to consult the public, but yesterday Vale of White Horse District Council – which needs to give it final approval – said it would put the scheme out for people to debate.

Already yesterday an Abingdon sign at Abingdon Bridge had -on-Thames added to it in marker pen by an unknown tagger.

Town Mayor Mike Badcock, who proposed restoring the -on-Thames moniker dropped in 1974, said: “I believe Abingdon deserves this name.

“It the jewel in the Crown on the River Thames.”

But speaking against the plans on Wednesday Liberal Democrat member Pat Lonergan, who was mayor in 2008 and 2009, said the town ran the risk of looking silly.

He said: “We don’t need to qualify the name of Abingdon. To me it’s pretentious.”

A decision to change the name of the Abingdon parish could be made by the district council as early as February. Council chief executive David Buckle said the public would be consulted first.

Related links

Abingdon Town Football Club chairman Tom Larman said the club would change its name too if the plans went through, adding: “We would be proud. It is prestigious.”

Comments(17)

Abingdon Neil says...
12:59pm Fri 25 Nov 11

Your report says that the town may change its name 'back to' Abingdon-on-Thames.

When was it previously called this?

steve king says...
12:59pm Fri 25 Nov 11

For Gods sake just get on and do it ! I doubt the public were consulted when they removed it, so why all the fuss now?

steve king says...
1:04pm Fri 25 Nov 11

Ah, shame you're not an Abingdonian Neil, then you would have remembered the MG's and Morland etc, they were but a few businesses proud to say were in Abingdon on Thames, in fact the Chamber of Commerce never droped its "on Thames" suffix.

Abingdon Neil says...
1:14pm Fri 25 Nov 11

Steve - I know that many businesses and organisations have added the 'on-Thames' over the years, and I have no problem with that, but to the best of my knowledge the town itself has always been called 'Abingdon', in line with our 455 year old Royal Charter.

Personally I support the Town Council, businesses and other organisations promoting themselves and the town as 'Abingdon-on-Thames' as it promotoes our biggest asset.

I wouldn't go through the time and hassle of changing the Town's official name though.

Oxford taxpayer says...
2:15pm Fri 25 Nov 11

I read yesterday that Staines in Middlesex are also considering adding 'on Thames'. Perhaps the two towns could be twinned?

EMBOX1 says...
2:57pm Fri 25 Nov 11

Sadly this will be abbreviated to AOT, which is probably what most people wish Mike Badcock would do. Daily.

godzilla says...
3:31pm Fri 25 Nov 11

How about Abingdon dead loss

davidofabingdon says...
4:27pm Fri 25 Nov 11

EMBOX1: I may have led a sheltered life. What does "AOT" stand for? Apart from Abingdon On Thames.

Milkbutnosugarplease says...
7:33pm Sat 26 Nov 11

Arse over tip, I think was meant. 'Pretentious' means pretending to be something you are not - posh or clever for example. Abingdon is certainly on the River Thames, so I can't see how it's pretentious to add the 'on Thames'. Localism is the new fashion in food, planning policy and maybe in place-names, so get on with it!

Spike62 says...
9:23am Sun 27 Nov 11

I always feel proud when ever I look under a bonnet of an old MG car when abroad and see the name plate stamped "Made in Abingdon-on-Thames" let's just get on with it and get it back.

abingdonian says...
11:34am Sun 27 Nov 11

A quick check through my stash of history of Abingdon books suggestes that Neil is right - as Harry Knights says in the introduction to his "Abingdon on Thames Today" (1982) that "is not the official name of the town but the river has played such an important part in its life that it should carry this title". None of the other history books refer to it as anything other than Abingdon.

But I completely agree with those who say "just get on with it": if a so-called "official" name-change is going to require a lot of bureaucracy, let those who want to use the new title do it unofficially as was clearly what happened in the past. It certainly shouldn't be a party political issue!

the great she-bear says...
12:24pm Sun 27 Nov 11

i don't see anything pretentious about the suffix. it would have been applied to abingdon if and when there was another town or village in england with the same name. google maps doesn't show any but that doesn't mean there wasn't one, once, that fell by the wayside .

i'd say put it up for a vote to the residents. as my mother used to say, "call me anything, just not late for dinner." honest. she did...

steve king says...
8:06pm Sun 27 Nov 11

Abingdonian, I too have a stash of Abingdon memorabilia, one of which is a "town guide" published by Burgess on behalf of the "borough corporation" It's called the Abingdon "on Thames guide" ?

colbart says...
3:06pm Mon 28 Nov 11

Apparently it was the Berkshire, Borough of Abingdon-on-Thames..
..

burro says...
10:36pm Tue 29 Nov 11

This is nothing to do with this, but I thought it was funny my friend told somebody one day he lived in Slough to which the other person replied "oh you mean north Windsor"!!!!!

Merlin22 says...
12:00am Wed 30 Nov 11

Just do it - this town needs every leg up it can get and a huge one is being on the Thames! Shout it from the roof tops I say.

Merlin22 says...
12:02am Wed 30 Nov 11

Just do it - this town needs every leg up it can get & being on the Thames is a huge one. Shout it from the rooftops I say.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree