Report this comment
  • "ox-cabby: As a user of taxis I agree with you. Labour will not get my vote next month."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Order to justify taxi CCTV plan

Order to justify taxi CCTV plan

Taxi driver Khalil Ahmed

Taxi driver Khalil Ahmed

First published in News Oxford Mail: Photograph of the Author by , Health reporter, also covering Kidlington. Call me on 01865 425271

OXFORD City Council has been told to justify its plan for recording conversations in taxis in a move that may take the controversial scheme closer to being ruled a breach of privacy.

The Information Commissioner’s Office has served a preliminary enforcement notice on the council over its plans to make all Hackney cabs and private hire taxis it licenses install a sound and video recording system.

The ICO says the compulsory scheme may not comply with the Data Protection Act and has asked the council to submit a written response proving otherwise.

If the commissioner’s office is not satisfied with the council’s response, it can issue an enforcement notice, demanding that the plan is scrapped.

Failure to comply is a criminal offence.

The council wants all new cabs to have the £460 cameras, with the existing 665 vehicles fitted by April 2015.

It has offered to pay £100 towards the cost of each recording system.

The council argues cameras will protect drivers from assaults and allegations by passengers.

It says footage would only be reviewed on request.

The watchdog contacted the council after the Oxford Mail reported on the proposals in November last year.

The ICO’s CCTV code of practice says: “CCTV must not be used to record conversations between members of the public, as this is highly intrusive.”

The scheme was due to start on April 1 but was put on hold by the council because of the watchdog’s intervention.

ICO spokesman Greg Jones said: “The notice relates to our concerns that the scheme may not be compliant with the requirements of the Data Protection Act.”

The Act’s principles include the demand that collection of information should be “not excessive”.

Related links

The council has until early next month to respond.

Spokesman Annette Cunningham said: “As a public body, it is right that the council should reflect on the concerns expressed. The scheme has been suspended pending that reconsideration.”

Nick Pickles, director of privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: “It’s time for the plan to be dropped.”

Private hire driver Khalil Ahmed – who collected 273 signatures on a petition against the plan – said: “It’s very positive news.

“We have always argued against the legality of it. It is futile and unnecessary and a waste of ratepayers’ money.”

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree