News RSS Feed


'I just hate it' says man of house he wants to bulldoze

Conservation groups are against plans to demolish this 19th century home and replace it with flats Conservation groups are against plans to demolish this 19th century home and replace it with flats

A Headington man with a history of battling the council has become embroiled in a fresh planning row after applying to demolish a house he can’t stand the sight of.

More than 30 years after buying a house in Old Headington to make the perfect family home, Martin Young has asked Oxford City Council if it can be demolished.

Mr Young has hit Oxford Mail headlines before after challenging the city council’s backing of Oxford Brookes University’s new £132m campus.

And in 2010 he also stirred controversy again when he attempted to turn a patch of land at Long Wall into a rubbish tip.

But his latest plan has met with opposition from conservation groups as 29 Old High Street lies in the heart of the Old Headington conservation area. Mr Young, 66, has applied to demolish the now vacant 19th century home and replace it with five three storey terraced houses.

It came after the city council ordered him in August to take action to improve the property.

He said: “I have a strong emotional block towards going anywhere near it. It has affected me quite badly.”

When asked how he would redevelop the house without going near it he said: “I will cross that bridge when I come to it.”

The property developer, who lives in Headington Hill, bought the property in 1978 with the intention of turning it into a family home if he married. He never did and ended up only sleeping in the property while he worked at his nearby mother’s house.

Mr Young then moved in with his mother Evelyn when she needed 24-hour care. She died last year at the age of 98 and he has remained at the family home in Headington Hill.

The Old Headington property has been vacant for five years and he said he cannot stand the sight of the building. He said: “The house, in my view, is no longer relevant. The development will be absolutely sympathetic to the conservation area.

“If you ask anyone with an open mind they will agree that it is a site for redevelopment.”

Stella Welford, of Friends of Old Headington, said: “We do not think it is a good idea because it is within the conservation area.”

The property is listed by Save, which campaigns for threatened historical buildings, on its annual Buildings at Risk register.

Save spokesman William Palin said: “We are concerned to hear of any building which is featured on our list being demolished.

“The buildings which we select are chosen because they are interesting or important. It is a particular concern to us that this building is in a conservation area.

“We would expect the council to resist any plans for demolition until the application has satisfied the strigent conditions which are required as part of the planning process.”

A spokesman for the city council said it imposed the improvement order as the property had fallen into a severe state of disrepair.

The spokesman added: “It was issued as a last resort after we had tried to work with the homeowner to bring the house up to a satisfactory standard. We have a remit to bring empty properties back into use and a standard for properties in conservation areas.”

Comments(26)

grumpyofwhitecross says...
6:40pm Thu 29 Sep 11

I fail to see how 5 three storey houses can replace 1 and still be sympathetic, given it is in a conservation area and the footprint of the existing house is not very big !!! What about parking ???

Dilligaf2010 says...
8:38pm Thu 29 Sep 11

If he'd like to sell it to me for £1, I'm sure I could raise sufficient funds to sympathetically refurbish the property, without knocking it down.

Niko Bellic says...
8:41pm Thu 29 Sep 11

He obviously doesn't hate it to the extent where he will sell it. Clearly his distaste for it only goes as far as the point where he can make money.
.
Dear Oxford Mail, please could you put me in touch with this fellow. I have seen Dilligaf's bid and wish to up it. The auction starts here.
.
£1.50

Dilligaf2010 says...
10:05pm Thu 29 Sep 11

Niko Bellic wrote:
He obviously doesn't hate it to the extent where he will sell it. Clearly his distaste for it only goes as far as the point where he can make money.
.
Dear Oxford Mail, please could you put me in touch with this fellow. I have seen Dilligaf's bid and wish to up it. The auction starts here.
.
£1.50
Let's push the boat out shall we... £2.00

Niko Bellic says...
11:59pm Thu 29 Sep 11

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
Niko Bellic wrote:
He obviously doesn't hate it to the extent where he will sell it. Clearly his distaste for it only goes as far as the point where he can make money.
.
Dear Oxford Mail, please could you put me in touch with this fellow. I have seen Dilligaf's bid and wish to up it. The auction starts here.
.
£1.50
Let's push the boat out shall we... £2.00
Hmmm... this is getting a bit rich for me, but what the hell, you only live once! £2.50

Dilligaf2010 says...
12:06am Fri 30 Sep 11

Niko Bellic wrote:
Dilligaf2010 wrote:
Niko Bellic wrote:
He obviously doesn't hate it to the extent where he will sell it. Clearly his distaste for it only goes as far as the point where he can make money.
.
Dear Oxford Mail, please could you put me in touch with this fellow. I have seen Dilligaf's bid and wish to up it. The auction starts here.
.
£1.50
Let's push the boat out shall we... £2.00
Hmmm... this is getting a bit rich for me, but what the hell, you only live once! £2.50
Fighting talk eh?

OK I'll go £3.05 and a Curly-Wurly

grumpyofwhitecross says...
12:22am Fri 30 Sep 11

its worth at least 4 groats and a camel.

grumpyofwhitecross says...
12:22am Fri 30 Sep 11

its worth at least 4 groats and a camel.

profgeof2000 says...
1:02am Fri 30 Sep 11

As an ex pat, I'd like to raise the ante to $25.00 - this way I can have a piece of Oxford...if I ever go back! Hope I can leave it as is - otherwise- hmmm =- guess next bidder gets it.

Dilligaf2010 says...
1:29am Fri 30 Sep 11

$25.00 that's big bucks, I'll have to speak to my financial advisor in the morning, see if I can liquidate some assets.

Danny A says...
8:29am Fri 30 Sep 11

A clear ploy to leave the house empty for so long as to let it decompose and make the case for it's demolition easier. This is yet another argument in favour of effective taxes on property, then no buildings would be left empty for long periods as there would be an incentive to either use it, or sell it to someone who can make better use of it.

Danny A says...
8:35am Fri 30 Sep 11

And as these comments demonstrate there are plenty of people prepared to take on the liabilities of owning a house if the price is right.

P.S £20 and two years worth of "homes and gardens" magazine back issues.

Shaun the Faun says...
8:47am Fri 30 Sep 11

Well! What surprise! We'd never have thought this was on the cards would we?

barbiedoll says...
11:04am Fri 30 Sep 11

What a waste!! If he is a so called property developer it looks like he has planned this all along, leave it to rot so it will have to be knocked down then his 5 houses on the lad to make a fast buck. he should be ashamed of himself. That house would have made a lovely home I will up the bidding to $30.00. Then someone who cares about the property could do it up and live in it....

Niko Bellic says...
11:12am Fri 30 Sep 11

Planning permission for this bloke should be flatly refused as it is clear he has purposefully let the house drop into disrepair and spoilt the area for such a long time in order to cash in later on.
.
I'll up the bid to 23 English pounds, a German dictionairy, unopened copy of the Lord of the Rings books. little used cat scratching pole, and branded San Miguel pint glass.
.
More seriously though, if this property were on the market, even in its current condition, at a reasonable price, it would be snapped up straight away, and even I would look at it with plenty of interest. The fella selling it is bullsh!tt!ng when he says he wants to knock it down because he "doesn't like it". Its a money making plan and always has been

sparky123456 says...
4:07pm Fri 30 Sep 11

surely if he bought it in the 70s he paid tens of thousands. Even in it's current state I dare say it'd fetch £200k as when restored to a family home in that area they sell around £400-700k! I thought there was some council order to repossess homes that are abandoned like this?
Either way I'll offer £50 and my collection of used Tesco carrier bags.

Dilligaf2010 says...
4:40pm Fri 30 Sep 11

Now the bids are getting a bit rich for my budget, I'll raise my bid to £60.00, a roll of masking tape, a 21 gear Mountain bike with unique cob-web and dust design, a small bag of cat fur, and 2 different limited edition tobacco tins.
I'd love to get my hands on this house, I bet there are some great original features crying out to be seen again.

Niko Bellic says...
9:32pm Fri 30 Sep 11

£75, a half full bottle of red wine, some small bits of carpet, a genuine carbon fibre door for a classic mini worth £250 AND I will wash your car.
.
Or I will speak to the bank and buy the place from you for £150,000 pending a building survey.
.
Now that the bidding has taken quite a leap, I feel that interest is sufficient to actually put the place on the market.

Lord Peter Macvey says...
2:20am Sat 1 Oct 11

On a serious point (although I detest people such as him that only buy houses/property/land for selfish financial gain) five houses will give four more families a home than if the house was renovated, and five more than if it is left to rot. My bid £750,000, on the condition of planning permission being granted.

jockox3 says...
3:04pm Sat 1 Oct 11

Sorry Niko, your bottle's half empty, not half full. Bid disqualified :)

rankandfile says...
8:28pm Sat 1 Oct 11

do any one want to start a book on when the fire will be

profgeof2000 says...
12:52pm Sun 2 Oct 11

Guess I am out of the bidding as you folks are over $100! Hey - I forgot about taxes on this place - anyone have any idea what these would be?

profgeof2000 says...
6:32pm Sun 2 Oct 11

OK since you guys are in barter mode- I will throw in (together with $100 US) womans bike,, motor mower, kid's scooter, and wheel barrow, oh yeah and a chandelier I have on Craigslist too!. Will figure out how to ship these low-cost later!

Mona2 says...
1:32pm Mon 3 Oct 11

I remember this house from when I was a child living in Headington. I used to play with a boy who lived there. I have watched it falling into disrepair over the years and wondered why. I can't understand how someone could have allowed this to happen or, indeed, afford for this to happen to it - 33 years is an awful long time. He can always give to me if he can't stand it.

profgeof2000 says...
4:24pm Mon 3 Oct 11

Guess he has paid taxes on it- else I presume it would be up for the unpaid taxes??

jockox3 says...
5:35pm Mon 3 Oct 11

I don't understand all the reference to 33 years and the idea that Mr Young only bought it to make a fast buck. 33 years is not a fast buck! And in fact it says he did live there until he needed to move in with his mother, which I think was only five years ago or so.

There is a wider issue here though. In English law there is a presumption that one ought to be able to do what one wishes with one's own property - enshrined centuries ago but significantly undermined much more recently. Things like conservation areas, imposed by order on whole areas, are part of this dilution of property rights. As well as the more than 300 reasons agents of the state and its associated bodies can now make entry onto someone's property without/regardless of consent.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree