Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
5:58pm Monday 25th January 2010 in
THE result of a ballot of hundreds of Oxford Bus Company drivers, engineers and office staff over strike action is expected to be revealed tomorrow.
About 400 members of the union Unite received ballot papers asking if they would be prepared to strike following an ongoing dispute over pay and conditions.
The deadline for the two-week postal vote is reached tonight and the ballots are expected to be counted by the Electoral Reform Services tomorrow.
All union members were asked if they wanted to take strike action, or industrial action short of a strike, or neither.
Passenger groups fear any strike action by one of the city’s two biggest bus companies, which carries more than 46,000 passengers a day, would bring gridlock to the city.
Unite’s regional industrial organiser Ian Methven said he would attempt to hold a meeting with the firm’s management to see if a new pay offer could be brokered, regardless of the outcome of the ballot.
He said: “Our intention isn’t to disrupt or inconvenience the general public. Even if there is a vote for industrial action we’ll be trying hard to resolve it before we take action.”
Mr Methven said other forms of industrial action could be considered, including staff refusing to work overtime or working to rule.
Two months ago, more than 80 per cent of union members rejected a 1.6 per cent pay rise offer from the company and said they were prepared to strike to settle the dispute.
Last month, they rejected a lower pay offer of 1.4 per cent which would have seen the company remove controversial conditions from the first offer, including reducing workers’ minimum daily working hours.
But some contentious measures, such as introducing a lower pay band for new drivers, remained.
Hugh Jaeger, Oxford’s representative for Bus Users UK, said: “A strike would bring chaos to Oxford.
“Half the people who come into Oxford come by bus and parts of the city are at a standstill anyway.
“It would only take a few more cars on the road to make sure nothing moves.
“I’d be surprised if any strike action lasted for long – but to see a job where drivers are relatively happy slipping into conflict is very sad.”
Oxford Bus Company runs 21 routes from the city and popular services to London, Heathrow, and Gatwick airports, Didcot and Abingdon.
One driver, who asked not to be named, said staff would reluctantly pursue industrial action.
He said: “A lot of drivers are ex-army, ex-navy or ex-airforce and come from occupations that never strike, but there’s a feeling that we have got no choice.”
Oxford Bus Company spokesman Phil Ashworth said: “We don’t think it’s appropriate to make any comment at the present time.”
Comments(21)
Petre Mcvey
says...
3:47am Tue 26 Jan 10
LadyPenelope
says...
8:12am Tue 26 Jan 10
BartSimpson
says...
10:20am Tue 26 Jan 10
LadyPenelope
says...
11:03am Tue 26 Jan 10
BartSimpson wrote:Well I don't know anyone who got over 1.5% pay rise this year, so there's my logic. simples. If you got over that, then lucky you.
1.4% is also a lot less than what other people got. Your logic is insane Ladypenelope.
jf
says...
11:30am Tue 26 Jan 10
LadyPenelope wrote:I agree and it is certainly not an insane figure.I think Lady Penelope you meant to say 1.4% is a lot more than most.
BartSimpson wrote:Well I don't know anyone who got over 1.5% pay rise this year, so there's my logic. simples. If you got over that, then lucky you.
1.4% is also a lot less than what other people got. Your logic is insane Ladypenelope.
BartSimpson
says...
11:54am Tue 26 Jan 10
LadyPenelope
says...
12:31pm Tue 26 Jan 10
BartSimpson wrote:It's not about keeping wages down. Personally I would take a pay cut if it prevented someone losing their job, or helped keep a business going.
Here we go again, excuses to keep wages down, "Should be grateful they even have a job"maybe they should get down on their hands and knees and lick the bosses boots thanking them. Because someone else has not got a rise does not mean everyone should not.
Ellie the Bruce
says...
1:31pm Tue 26 Jan 10
BartSimpson
says...
2:54pm Tue 26 Jan 10
EB
says...
8:24pm Tue 26 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey
says...
3:32am Wed 27 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey
says...
6:03am Wed 27 Jan 10
jf
says...
7:40am Wed 27 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey wrote:What a pathetic comment and very rude.
Jf. The above goes for you as well. If you husband will let you out. I suggest night classes, to catch up on the education that you missed out on first time around.
locodogz
says...
11:21am Wed 27 Jan 10
jf wrote:Don't rise to it - jf! Notice our Petre must be feeling very proud of his new long word - he's used it twice today with an inappropriate capital 'm' both times - it's not a proper noun, you silly boy - and somewhat ironic coming from a blatant misogynist....
Petre Mcvey wrote: Jf. The above goes for you as well. If you husband will let you out. I suggest night classes, to catch up on the education that you missed out on first time around.What a pathetic comment and very rude. What gives you the right to personally attack me?I can see grammar and puntuation are a problem for you too?! I quote-"If you husband will let you out." I think the word you mean is" your" not "you".There is no need to put a full stop there as you hadn't finished your sentence properly either. You know nothing about me. Just because I write a commnet doesn't mean I don't go out and earn myself. I am working most days and evenings to make ends meet and having to care for a disabled child. Just because someone doesn't agree with you-why do you always insist on making it personal? The only thing I can think of is that you can't have nothing else to do?! Very sad.Almost feel sorry for you.
jf
says...
1:06pm Wed 27 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey
says...
7:41pm Wed 27 Jan 10
jf
says...
9:31pm Wed 27 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey wrote:What a pathetic response? Where did this come from?
Jf it is because of your uncaring attitude towards your fellow workers. They should be grateful to have a job. I would guess had you been alive a couple of hundred years ago, you would have made that comment about the Slaves as well.
Petre Mcvey
says...
3:12am Thu 28 Jan 10
LadyPenelope
says...
8:18am Thu 28 Jan 10
locodogz
says...
6:11pm Thu 28 Jan 10
Petre Mcvey wrote:Cowardly, Petre, cowardly....I've regularly enjoyed some lively banter with contributors here but, as I'd hope that Gollum, Grundon and a few others could testify to, have never 'reported' anyone - frankly it wouldn't occur to me as I’ve never felt the need to – lively banter is what makes this site worthwhile and IMHO the posters listed above (along with a few others – Lord Turville(?!?) – sorry if I’ve got that wrong etc) whilst holding differing views to mine are capable of articulate arguments to support them.
Jf. There is no point in pulling up PocoLoco from Bicester. As all he ever does is attack regular contributers, and when they respond, report them and get their accounts suspended. So best to treat him as you do an attention seeking child. Ignore him. Anyway off skiing with the kids in a few hours time for a week, but am taking the lap-top so might be able to keep in touch. P.S. It is incredible how much you save by going now, and not in the Half Term holiday, the kids love it as well as they get 2 holidays.
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find jobs in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire and find friendship
Search Now »
Find homes in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Cars for sale in and around Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Whitto says...
10:15pm Mon 25 Jan 10
More sloppy work from the OM......