Sir – I agree with Professor Elliott’s comments on the poor choice of architectural quality chosen by local authorities in modern times (Letters, November 12). The 1960s period resulted in some of the worst.

Not only were buildings of historical interest demolished,but their replacements were often used as experimental construction.

Oxford’s climate,while not as bad as that of some northern industrial cities,was still capable of disfiguring stone and concrete surfaces in the days before ‘clean air’ was envisaged.

This is not to say, of course,that our ancestors always got it right.

Housing of the 19th century in St Ebbe’s underwent wholesale demolition in the 1950s and 1960s due to their poor condition. Their replacements, although with modern amenities, may not last as long.

The provision of a concert hall/arts centre would surely be a boost to this area,if space could be found.

Rather than spend millions of pounds on ‘improving’ the Westgate shopping centre (does it really need it?),would the removal of the ugly multi-storey car-park at the rear make way for such a project?

Parking for the disabled would obviously be needed, both for shopping and concerts, and public transport made available to others, perhaps park-and-ride.

The car park has no architectural merits, built for function rather than form. The only part of it of any interest was the ‘golf ball’ control room, now sadly gone.

Westgate’s main development period (1969-73) removed much that was old, and arguably in poor condition, but if Oxford is to have amenities that are fit for its national standing, a careful balance will be needed to satisfy both the commercial needs of business and the cultural requirements of its population.

S.Wyatt, Oxford