A speech made by the Home Secretary has been logged as a 'hate incident' by police after a complaint was made by an Oxford academic.

Physics professor Joshua Silver from Oxford University reported Amber Rudd's speech at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham in October to West Midlands Police.

The Daily Telegraph reported that Prof Silver did not actually see the speech, and made the complaint to officers based on a draft.

Ms Rudd had set out a number of possibly measures to reduce immigration, including new restrictions on recruiting overseas workers and students, during the address in Birmingham in October.

She said ministers would consider whether new tests should be imposed to ensure those coming to the UK are "filling gaps in the labour market, not taking jobs British people could do".

The Times reported that Prof Silver, director of the Centre for Vision in the Developing World, based at St Catherine’s College, was so concerned he reported the speech to police.

He told the BBC: "Some politicians have been using hate crime as an instrument to foster support for their political aims."

West Midlands Police said the complaint had to be recorded as a "non-crime hate incident" in accordance with guidelines.

There was no evidence of a hate crime being committed, the force added.

National guidance for police states: "Where any person, including police personnel, reports a hate incident which would not be the primary responsibility of another agency, it must be recorded regardless of whether or not they are the victim, and irrespective of whether there is any evidence to identify the hate element."

A Home Office spokeswoman said: "This was not a hate crime.The Home Secretary has been crystal clear that hatred has absolutely no place in a Britain that works for everyone.

"She's made countering hate one of her key priorities, indeed one of the first public interventions she made was to launch the Hate Crime Action Plan."

In the wake of Ms Rudd's speech, suggestions that businesses may be asked to disclose information on the number of foreign workers they employ sparked a furious backlash.

Ministers later insisted any data gathered would not be published and it was not about "naming and shaming" firms.