Grove Parish Council's new chairman puts spotlight on developers

June Stock

June Stock

First published in News

THE new chairman of Grove Parish Council says she is looking forward to taking developers to task and getting the best facilities for the village.

June Stock, a Grove resident of 40 years, was voted in as chairman at a full council meeting on May 27.

She takes over from Frank Parnell, who was chairman for 12 years.

Mrs Stock said she wanted to make sure housing developments like Grove Airfield, where 2,500 homes were given planning permission in December, are built right.

She said: “It is about making sure we get as much as we can from section 106 agreements, where the developers give money or buildings. We are interested in the plan for a community hub at the airfield.”

Vale of White Horse District Council gave developers Taylor Wimpey and Persimmon permission to build 2,500 homes on the former Second World War airfield in December. Another 1,500 homes have permission at Crab Hill, and 200 at Stockham Farm.

Mrs Stock worked at Grove’s Crown packaging plant for 32 years before retiring.

Our top stories:

Mum says Oxford Health let down son who escaped mental hospital

Oxford Mail: Ian McLean

9:00am Friday 30th January 2015

THE family of man who escaped a mental hospital, fled abroad then hanged himself in a prison cell have said he was let down by Oxford Health.

UPDATE: Snow and sleet forecast for Saturday in Oxfordshire

Oxford Mail: Ice warning for Sussex after more snow falls

12:06pm Thursday 29th January 2015

SNOW has been forecast for Oxfordshire over the weekend and a yellow weather warning is still in place for today.

Head ‘fobbed off’ over delayed Windmill Primary School extension

Oxford Mail: Windmill head teacher, Lynn Knapp

7:33pm Friday 30th January 2015

A HEADTEACHER at an Oxford primary school has claimed she is getting “fobbed off” by Oxfordshire County Council over questions about delayed construction work at the school.

Julia Knight appears in court charged with attempted murder of patient in Horton General Hospital

Oxford Mail:

4:14pm Friday 30th January 2015

A WOMAN charged with the attempted murder of a hospital patient today appeared in Oxford Crown Court.

Update: Man in court accused of £4.8m fraud at Mini plant

Oxford Mail: The production line for the mini at the BMW plant in Cowley as it looks now

3:50pm Friday 30th January 2015

A MAN has been accused of fraudulently pocketing £4.8m from the assembly and services division at the Mini plant in Cowley.

Oxfordshire County Council chief executive Joanna Simons to stand down in June - and will not be replaced

Oxford Mail: Joanna Simons

1:10pm Friday 30th January 2015

OXFORDSHIRE'S biggest local authority will scrap its top unelected position as part of a radical shake-up to save costs, it was revealed today.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:54pm Fri 6 Jun 14

Quentin Walker says...

"...She said: “It is about making sure we get as much as we can from section 106 agreements, where the developers give money or buildings..."

Section 106 is official blackmail and though it is paid by the developers, the consumer ends up paying in the end (over 25 - 40 years).
"...She said: “It is about making sure we get as much as we can from section 106 agreements, where the developers give money or buildings..." Section 106 is official blackmail and though it is paid by the developers, the consumer ends up paying in the end (over 25 - 40 years). Quentin Walker
  • Score: 0

7:26am Mon 9 Jun 14

CtrlAltTab says...

Quentin Walker wrote:
"...She said: “It is about making sure we get as much as we can from section 106 agreements, where the developers give money or buildings..."

Section 106 is official blackmail and though it is paid by the developers, the consumer ends up paying in the end (over 25 - 40 years).
Source of your statement?
The consumer ends up paying? really where did you get this information from?

Also 'official blackmail'? What actually is this? surely any sort of blackmail is illegal?
[quote][p][bold]Quentin Walker[/bold] wrote: "...She said: “It is about making sure we get as much as we can from section 106 agreements, where the developers give money or buildings..." Section 106 is official blackmail and though it is paid by the developers, the consumer ends up paying in the end (over 25 - 40 years).[/p][/quote]Source of your statement? The consumer ends up paying? really where did you get this information from? Also 'official blackmail'? What actually is this? surely any sort of blackmail is illegal? CtrlAltTab
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree