RESIDENTS have criticised an Oxford college for submitting its development proposals in the middle of summer.

St Cross College wants to construct more than 50 student bedrooms, a lecture theatre and a library at its St Giles site.

But the building in Pusey Street has been met with opposition for its modern design.

The Oxford University college is seeking planning permission from Oxford City Council to meet its need for student accommodation.

John Landers, chairman of the St John Street area residents’ association, has called on the city council to extend the deadline for public comments from August 15.

He said: “We fully understand the college’s wish to accommodate more of its students and have greatly appreciated the efforts made to keep us informed of progress.

“We are disappointed that it has chosen to submit this application when many residents are away and will not have the opportunity to comment. We hope the council will extend the deadline.

“It is always important that any new development should be in sympathy with its surroundings.

“We are lucky to live in a part of the city that enjoys a distinctive, traditional character.

“Many residents are concerned not only that the proposed building is over-large for the confined space available, but also that its very contemporary design is too far out of keeping with its neighbours.”

St John Street resident Penny Lenon, secretary of the residents’ association, added: “Lots of people are away I noticed the notices went this weekend which gives less than three weeks to comment.”

The extension to St Cross’s existing 19th century building has been designed by Níall McLaughlin Architects. As well as 53 student rooms, the proposed development would have five student kitchens, two seminar rooms and a wine cellar.

The new L-shaped building would be at the back of the college, along its boundary walls with Pusey Street and Pusey Lane.

It would sit in Oxford’s central conservation area next to the college’s Grade II*-listed Pusey House Chapel.

St Cross College declined to comment, but in its application says the new building is “entirely compatible with its surroundings”.

The city council declined to comment on whether the deadline would be extended or not.