THE eight-week signal grades' pay dispute yesterday descended to near
farce, although would-be rail travellers hit by the latest 24-hour
stoppage due to end at noon today will not have been amused.
Firstly Railtrack claimed to have improved its interim offer from 3.2%
to 4.7% by offering to consolidate half of the 6% proposed improvement
in basic rates as detailed in yesterday's Herald. This would appear to
take it to just 1% below the 5.7% ''offer that never was'' withdrawn
under Government pressure two months ago.
The RMT union maintained it had been unaware of such an improvement,
apparently floated via Acas last week, but rejected it any way as being
still below the earlier 5.7% offer. However if Railtrack was now
prepared to put in writing that basic rates could be improved by 4.7%
that might be worth discussing.
The Railtrack chairman, Mr Bob Horton, made a bizarre offer to pay the
difference between his salary (#120,000 for a three-day-week) and RMT
general secretary Mr Jimmy Knapp's (#46,000) to charity if that would
help resolve the dispute. Not surprisingly it was shot down by Mr Knapp
as being ''unhelpful'', and denounced as a stunt by Labour.
Mr Knapp meanwhile jetted back from Geneva before the start of the
International Transport Workers Federation congress he was due to
attend, to resume control of the dispute.
Last night he was contemplating legal action against certain tabloid
newspapers who accused him of ''freeloading'' abroad, while his members
were on strike and the travelling public faced massive disruption.
The British Rail chairman, Sir Bob Reid, called on the RMT union to
re-ballot its 6600 signalling members and suspend further strike action
in the rail dispute until the result of such a ballot was known, knowing
full well that there is little chance of this happening.
Today the RMT is due to release the results of a ballot of some 550
RMT signal box supervisors and managers, whose entry into strike action
planned for Friday of next week and the following Monday and Tuesday,
could prove crucial.
In a letter to Mr Knapp, Sir Bob said extending the industrial action
further would be ''hugely destructive''.
In a letter to the Railtrack chairman, Sir Bob said that he wanted him
to know ''of my serious concern at yesterday's breakdown in your
negotiations with the RMT''.
He said the continuing disruption was ''causing intolerable
inconvenience to all who use the railway''.
He added: ''We cannot expect to keep passengers or freight customers
if we treat them like this. The disruption has seriously damaged our
business and the only winners in that are our competitors --
particularly on the roads.''
Labour transport spokesman Brian Wilson said last night: ''The last
thing we need at this stage is an empty stunt from Mr Horton, whose
generosity is cushioned by the #1.25m pay-off which he received from BP.
Mr Alan Pottage, the RMT's national executive member for Scotland said
the strike yesterday had virtually 100% support. ''The mood of our
membership in Scotland is getting more and more determined,'' he said.
''Robert Horton's new offer, as he calls it, was made to the press not
to us. It is just another of their strange little ploys to try and break
the strike.''
The Scottish Trades Union Congress was yesterday challenged to
organise a 24-hour general strike in support of the rail signal workers.
The call came from Scottish Militant Labour which claimed victory for
the striking signal staff was vital to protect low-paid workers against
a further round of ''union bashing'' by the Government.
The Scottish TUC is to help distribute 10,000 leaflets seeking
continued public support for signalling staff, because RMT staff fear
they could be sacked if they hand out the leaflets themselves. The
leaflet gives pay and productivity figures and adds: ''Strike action has
been increased because the signal staff have been left with absolutely
no alternative, with the Government sitting on top of Railtrack to make
sure that no serious negotiations take place.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article