THE siege at Shotts maximum security jail, which left seven prison
officers injured, one seriously, ended last night almost 24 hours after
it began.
A Scottish Office spokesman said that the 74 inmates remaining in D
hall had left peacefully at 7.15pm and were in the custody of the prison
staff.
An internal inquiry has begun into the trouble which has left D hall
and the dining room badly damaged. Last night prison authorities refused
to comment on the nature of the prisoners' grievances.
But stringent new strip search measures introduced on visitors are
believed to have sparked off the latest trouble at the jail.
Banners displayed from several cells blamed prison brutality and the
strip searches for the violent protest.
It is understood that the measures have recently been stepped up in a
number of Scottish jails in an attempt to stem the flow of drugs into
the establishments.
The riot began around 8.30pm on Thursday when more than 100 inmates in
D hall went on the rampage.
Talks continued between a team of prison negotiators and the remaining
74 protesters barricaded within the wing. A group of 31 prisoners gave
themselves up early yesterday.
''At this stage it would be unwise to comment as to the reason or
reasons behind the protest,'' the Scottish Office spokesman said.
Earlier, he confirmed that one prison officer had been stabbed during
the siege. The officer, who has not been named, was taken to hospital
where his condition was described as ''stable''.
Another of the injured men was also detained in hospital after being
struck on the back by a missile. He was said to be ''satisfactory''.
Five other officers were allowed home after treatment. They were
injured during attempts by the prison staff to reoccupy D hall's dining
area just after 4am.
The spokesman said that police were investigating the circumstances in
which the seven prison officers were injured and a report would be
prepared for the procurator-fiscal.
Meanwhile, a former Shotts prisoner said yesterday that he believed it
was not just one incident that had caused the riot, but a host of
grievances by inmates.
He said: ''Management are creating a hate factory when they should be
listening to people who have been through the system. The management are
the main problem -- they have gone in with Draconian measures to a brand
new prison, and that cocktail just does not work. They would be better
suited to Perth -- or Colditz.''
Another source of unrest, he claimed, was the existence of the
''mufties'' -- the Minimum Use of Force Tactical Intervention Squad.
He alleged instances where the squad had taken away prisoners while
they were talking to their visitors on the grounds that they might have
been passed contraband.
''The prisoners are in there as a punishment -- not to get
punishment,'' he added. ''Is a baton on the back of the head minimum
force?''
''I was in there when it first opened and the conditions were so
relaxed that you actually thought you were in a hospital. This is not a
situation of prisoners wanting more and more comforts.''
Unlike previous major incidents at Scotland's newest jail, which has
seen five disturbances in the past six years -- four involving the
taking of hostages -- there was an eerie silence around the #15m complex
for much of yesterday.
A large police presence remained around the perimeter gates, giving
some inmates targets for occasional shouts of abuse.
After repeated efforts to begin dialogue with the prisoners had been
ignored, prison authorities made a breakthrough shortly before 11am, and
talks began. These continued throughout much of the day although
progress was initially extremely slow. Elsewhere in the prison, the
remaining 442 inmates went about their normal routines.
The chief executive of the Scottish Prison Service, Mr Edward
Frizzell, last night welcomed the successful conclusion to the incident
without further injury. He praised prison staff for their handling of
the siege and said they had carried out their duties in a highly
professional manner.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article