COUNCIL efforts to seize the initiative on public sector reform by supporting voluntary mergers and shared services instead of wholesale reorganisation were praised by ministers yesterday.
The Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (Cosla) agreed to publish a six-point "think piece" on reform next month, as its contribution to the debate on the shape and scale of the public sector.
The paper also advocates the integration of local health and economic development services into councils, and allowing island councils to run all services in their area within a single border. Quangos and Scottish Executive agencies such as Communities Scotland could also be broken up and theirwork taken over by democratically accountable local authorities, the paper says.
Council leaders hope the ideas will pre-empt a rival paper being written by Tom McCabe, finance minister, which they fear could bring more drastic measures. Despite the blatant attempt to steal his thunder, Mr McCabe's office said he was "encouraged" by Cosla's efforts. "We are pleased that they are focusing on reform and improving the delivery of public services, " a spokesman said, adding the minister agreed reform should be about far more than the number of councils.
However, within Cosla there is scepticism about some of the proposals. No councils have offered to merge, and there is no sign of any volunteering soon. Some see the idea as Cosla's leadership deluding itself about boundary changes.
The offer to share services is also seen as an attempt to avoid reorganisation.
The theory is that if councils can weave a bewildering web of cross-border partnerships, ministers will find it impossible to unpick and the number of councils will stay at 32.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article