FINANCIAL services group
Prudential has pulled out of its proposed #30m acquisition of Taiwan's Hung Fu Life after that company's principal shareholder attempted to change arrangements settled upon in the Agreement in Principle document signed on June 30, writes Kristy Dorsey.
The shareholder, whose name was not immediately available, was said to have demanded more cash and a larger minority shareholding than was originally agreed.
In addition to his slice of the #30m purchase price, that investor was also slated to retain an 8% equity interest in the business.
The Taiwan acquisition was regarded as a missing piece in the puzzle for Prudential's Asian operations.
The UK insurer has no activities in Taiwan but does operate subsidiaries or joint ventures in Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Indonesia and India.
It is also on the verge of being granted a licence for business in China.
Mark Tucker, chief executive of Prudential Asia, said the company was ''disappointed'' by its failure to pull off the Hung Fu Life deal.
However, he added that any transaction had to deliver value for the company's shareholders.
''In our view the further, materially different demands placed on the terms of the deal, following our Agreement in Principle, run contrary to the interests of our shareholders,'' Tucker said.
''We are committed to the region and will continue to seek opportunities for expansion in Taiwan, where we see significant potential for growth.''
The Taiwanese government, which brokered a large part of the deal, is believed to be deeply embarrassed that it has now fallen through.
This could prove beneficial to Prudential, which is now thought to be considering setting up a new, wholly-owned operation in the island country.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article