Colin Montgomerie yesterday said that he would have done some things differently to Nick Faldo last week - and that it would be a "a shame" if fellow Scot Sandy Lyle is not made captain for the 2010 Ryder Cup.
Asked if he thought Faldo got the best of the team beaten by five points at Valhalla, Montgomerie, not part of the action for the first time since 1989, replied: "Possibly not."
The eight-time European No.1, who could have gone past Faldo's cup points record if he had been given a wild card, gave a broad hint that he thought Faldo putting Open and PGA champion Padraig Harrington out last in the singles was the biggest mistake. "It occurred to me when he saw the order that unfortunately Ian Poulter, Lee Westwood, Harrington are possibly our three strongest players and they might not be - might be, but might not be - involved in the final shake-up," said Montgomerie.
"Play them earlier and they would have been involved 100%. Only once in the whole history of the Ryder Cup has the No.12 decided the match. Bernhard Langer in 1991," he added.
Although there has already been talk of successful 2006 captain Ian Woosnam returning into the job for the first ever match on Welsh soil, Montgomerie has spoken up for Lyle. Of Europe's "Big Five" of the 1980s - Seve Ballesteros, Faldo, Bernhard Langer, Lyle and Woosnam - only Lyle has not yet been given the captaincy. "I think it would be nice to see him," said Montgomerie. "I feel it would be a shame if it wasn't Sandy."
Montgomerie added that no amount of money would change his mind about wanting to play again rather than captain next time and that it did not take Einstein to work out the next three leaders.
By that he means Lyle in 2010, Jose Maria Olazabal in Chicago in 2012 and then himself at Gleneagles in 2014. By then Montgomerie hopes Europe will have copied the United States by having four wild cards rather than the current two - and if not, then he will certainly be asking for that.
Lee Westwood, meanwhile, is turning his focus away from the Valhalla defeat and, unlike last week, should not have any abuse to put up with at The Belfry this week, but fatigue could well be a factor in his defence of the Quinn Direct British Masters.
Of Faldo's Ryder Cup side, only Westwood and Graeme McDowell are in action on the course that staged the 1985, 1989, 1993 and 2002 events.
Oliver Wilson was to have played as well, but withdrew because he did not think he was able to give his best after his Ryder Cup debut.
Westwood played in four of the five sessions in Kentucky and also had to cope with some "shameful" heckling as well, although he now regrets some of the comments he made.
"A lot of what I said didn't come out quite as I intended and finished up sounding like sour grapes," he said in a statement issued by his management company yesterday.
"So let me say right now that I applaud America's victory, Paul Azinger's captaincy in general and the vast majority of the watching public who witnessed a titanic struggle between two very good sides.
"I regret that I singled out a small minority of the crowd who had a go at me and my family during competition days because far and away the greater majority were impeccably behaved and got right behind their team, as did the excellent European supporters.
"My comments about the hecklers and Paul's geeing up the crowd before the event were in no way intended to be an excuse or the words of an ungracious loser.
"I may not have been too thrilled with one or two things that happened in Valhalla, but I am taking absolutely nothing away from America's win.
"When you're beaten by a better side, you just have to admit it."
McDowell and Westwood have both been given a late tee-off in today's opening round to allow them more rest.
Westwood is bound to carry the biggest gallery of the day because he is paired with Montgomerie and former US Open champion Michael Campbell.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article