The decision by Shell to re-use the Brent Spar installation rather than dump it at sea was welcomed by Greenpeace yesterday, writes Graeme Smith.
However, although they said it was ''the beginning of the end of the Brent Spar affair'', they criticised the international oil operator for taking two years and spending millions of pounds to come up with its conclusion.
Shell announced yesterday Brent Spar would be re-used and recycled under a #26m proposal by a joint venture company set up by Aberdeen's Wood Group and Maritime GMC of Stavanger. It is to become the base of a new ro-ro ferry quay near Stavanger.
Announcing the decision, Mr Heinz Rothermund, Shell Expro's managing director, said: ''This solution is not, and never can be, a precedent for other offshore structures. We have been explaining for three years that Spar is unique. This is a 'one-off' structure.
''Finally, it is a solution that was not available to us when we first considered decommissioning the Spar in 1991,'' said Mr Rothermund.
Greenpeace believes the way is now clear for a permanent ban on dumping decommissioned offshore installations in the ocean. Mr Chris Rose, its Brent Spar campaign director, said: ''Shell has taken over two years to accept what the European public told it in 1995.
''You don't dump - you re-use or recycle. Shell should accept dumping at sea is wrong in principle and unnecessary in practice.''
He said there were up to 600 installations to be decommissioned in the European Union and Norwegian waters, many being considered as candidates for ocean dumping by the UK and Norwegian governments.
Shortly after Shell decided to reconsider deep-sea dumping, the Oslo-Paris Commission (OSPAR) which is responsible for preventing pollution in the north-east Atlantic announced a moratorium on the dumping of installations.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article