At least five of his colleagues are
lining up behind veteran Ulster
Unionist leader James Molyneaux.
But, as Russell Edmonds explains,
they may be motivated more
by leadership ambitions than loyalty
BEHIND the struggle to keep Northern Ireland's peace process on the
rails, another political battle is hotting up. In both cases, it could
be said that James Molyneaux, now in his 75th year, is a key player.
On the plane from London to Belfast, he looks a somewhat insignificant
figure, his head buried in a gardening magazine as it was one evening
last week. Molyneaux is probably the most low-profile political leader
in the UK, a man who shirks media attention and is noted for his reserve
and simple tastes.
But without his support, Prime Minister John Major might not survive
and the Northern Ireland peace process could falter. Wielding such
apparent power as he does so quietly, it should come as no surprise that
several of Molyneaux's lieutenants now appear increasingly envious of
his role and restless to take over from him.
The next few weeks are likely to be the most important of his
political career as the British and Irish governments prepare to launch
their framework document with its controversial plans for new
all-Ireland institutions.
As if that were not enough, the Ulster Unionist leader faces a
personal challenge. While no-one openly opposes him, the prospects of
change at the top of the Unionist Party now looms large. Even before the
recent controversy surrounding leaks to the Times newspaper on the plans
for Ulster, Molyneaux's future was in question.
Though he has said nothing publicly, his fellow MPs at Westminster
have become convinced that he would stand down from office sometime in
1995, thus ending a political reign as leader which began in 1979. Now,
as the deadline for the British-Irish proposals nears, the pressures
grow on Molyneaux and on those who are now vying to take his place.
The prize for them is the leadership of a party which holds the
balance of power at Westminster and, thus, may determine whether the
Conservative Government remains in office for its full term. More
parochially, the Ulster Unionist Party has by far the largest support in
Northern Ireland and, without its backing, it seems no future settlement
in Ireland can be obtained.
Furthermore, if a new settlement is agreed, power will move from
London to Belfast where a Northern Ireland Assembly will be established,
in which the Unionists would be the largest block, and probably provide
the leader.
Not since the 1920s have the stakes been so high in Ireland with a
focus of attention that stretches from London, Dublin and Brussels to
the White House, where President Clinton is preparing to host a special
conference on Ulster later this year.
Molyneaux has been unassailable until recently when it emerged that
his influential relationship with John Major was turning cold. The
Unionist leader, who is a Privy Counsellor, had enjoyed the ear of Mr
Major over the past two years and, particularly, during the period when
the British Prime Minister and his Irish counterpart, Albert Reynolds,
produced the Downing Street peace declaration in December 1993.
At home in Ulster, Molyneaux's supporters believed his influence was
such that no deal could be struck between London and Dublin without his
backing. But the leaks have suggested otherwise, and Molyneaux himself
admits that he has been somewhat cold-shouldered by Downing Street in
recent weeks.
If that is the case then the ageing leader's demise could well be
hastened. He faces re-election at the annual meeting of the Ulster
Unionists' Council on March 18 and, though this is a formality, the
prospect of him deciding to bow out gracefully or of a stalking-horse
candidate emerging to challenge him cannot be ruled out.
Whatever happens, other MPs in his party are already queuing up to
take over, quietly jousting for pole position in the expectation that
this will be his last year in office.
At least five of the nine-strong Ulster Unionist group at Westminster
could be in the running. They range from the dour rural character of
William Ross, the party's chief whip, to the more outspoken John Taylor,
who still bears the facial scars from being shot by an IRA attacker in
1972 when he was a minister in the Stormont government at that time.
The leader of the Orange Order, the Rev Martin Smyth, says he will
stand if and when Molyneaux steps down, while other strong candidates
include Ken Maginnis, the party's spokesman on security, and David
Trimble, a former university law lecturer who has made a name as an
articulate performer on television.
All are Members of Parliament and, while it is not beyond the bounds
of possibility that the party could choose someone from outside
Westminster, this seems very impractical given that the political power
base remains in London, for the moment anyway.
Since none of the candidates has openly declared himself, it is
difficult to pick a favourite, but the front-runners at the moment
appear to be William Ross and John Taylor.
Ross has just celebrated his 59th birthday, he owns a farm at
Dungiven, County Londonderry, and has been an MP for the area since
1974. He appears, like Molyneaux, to be a man of few public words,
unimpressive with the media but very active behind the scenes.
Unlike some of the other candidates, he does not deviate from the
mainstream party line but was among the most sceptical about the Downing
Street peace deal and a regular critic of the Irish Government's
involvement in Northern Ireland.
In 1988 he opposed power sharing, claiming it would give Nationalists
a built-in veto, and is on record as saying that Dublin could never have
a say in the government of Northern Ireland.
John Taylor, aged 57, is the party's most high-profile MP. He has been
in Ulster politics since his university days and was the youngest
Unionist to be elected to the old Stormont Parliament. Unlike Ross, he's
rarely out of the news of the local television screens, his speeches
often addressing controversial issues and, sometimes, drawing
considerable anger from Nationalists.
In 1972 the official IRA tried to assassinate him in his home town of
Armagh. He was seriously wounded in the face and chest and had to
undergo extensive surgery, but that has not deterred him from following
a political career. At one point he angered the Irish authorities by
claiming that Loyalist violence would eventually reach Dublin, and he
has also said that, in the event of a united Ireland, he anticipates an
exodus of Protestants.
Recently Taylor said that anyone considering challenging Molyneaux
should be ''politically knee-capped'' but he is clearly one of the
leading contenders when the leader resigns.
Of the others, David Trimble is seen as a tough Unionist advocate but
may not be long enough in the party to win the top role this time. He
qualified as a barrister and later became a senior lecturer in law and
Dean of the Faculty at Queen's University in Belfast, before becoming MP
for Upper Bann in 1990.
Aged 50, Trimble has been heavily critical of the Irish Government's
links with the peace process and their attempts to persuade the IRA with
what he sees as unacceptable political concessions. He is on record as
saying that it was wrong to be ''publicly negotiating with terrorists''.
Ken Maginnis, 56, the MP for Fermanagh and South Tyrone, is a former
teacher and speaks on security matters for the Ulster Unionists. The
Enniskillen Remembrance Day bombing took place in his constituency and
he is noted for his strong opposition to terrorism.
He was critical of President Clinton's decision to issue a visa to the
Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams and appeared on television in the US in a
debate with Adams. He has been demanding that the IRA hand over its
weapons before Sinn Fein can be involved in political talks.
Finally, the Rev Martin Smyth, Grand Master of the Orange Order in
Ireland, was originally a Presbyterian minister. He resigned his church
ministry to become MP for South Belfast in 1982 in a by-election caused
by the assassination of the Rev Robert Bradford.
Smyth would have enormous support from within the Orange Order, which
he leads during the summer months in a number of major parades and
demonstrations. However, the Unionist Party is attempting to shed any
sectarian image and it may be that the appointment of such a
high-profile Orange leader would not be acceptable in some quarters.
Aged 64, Smyth is seen as another traditionalist, a factor in his
favour among the grassroots Unionists who will be called on to choose a
new leader.
At the moment Ross appears the favourite even if the prospect of
having him as leader finds little enthusiasm in either Dublin or London.
But whoever is chosen is hardly likely to deviate from the position
adopted by Molyneaux over so many years.
From the speeches and profiles of the main contenders for his job, it
is evident that none of them is likely to break the solid political
mould of Ulster Unionism, which James Molyneaux has set firmly since
1979.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article