THE plans to improve Cycling safety (Oxford Mail, May 25) reminds me of steps taken about 20 years ago to achieve this and to encourage cycling.

Cycle lanes were marked out on several roads.

Cycling was permitted on parts of some pavements and in parks (to the discomfort of walkers); forward waiting areas were provided at traffic lights and more secure racks provided.

But there was certainly no noticeable improvement in cycling practices and, consequently, no improvement in safety.

Cyclists took advantage of what was offered without any reciprocation by way of showing more consideration themselves for their own safety or for that of other road users and pedestrians.

I notice that those much-needed cycle-calming barriers are to be removed.

It appears the convenience of cyclists takes precedence over the safety of pedestrians.

Your editorial supports the proposals, costing £84,000 over four years, but makes only a passing reference to what cyclists should do.

Improvements to conditions for cycling will be nullified, as they have been in the past, unless the standard of cycling is improved.

Incidentally, when was the last prosecution for a cycling offence? Even some on-the-spot fines can be remitted.

ROBERT SEPHTON, Cherwell Close, Abingdon