Sir - I am sure I am not alone feeling compelled to object to Mr Nigel Clarke's letter (March 21).

Surely Oxford, the heritage jewel in the crown of the south-east region, more than compares with his recommendations.

This weekend, a national daily, prior to the Boat Race, compares Oxford and Cambridge for a city break, extolling the virtues of both a dead heat.

We have colleges, churches along with their works of art, museums and galleries modern and old, meadows, rivers, quads, open spaces, nature reserves, the revamped prison and castle site, continual TV and filming trails, sports facilities, theatres and venues for revellers - Oxonians included, to suit every taste and culture.

Regrettably there are far too many empty shop premises within the city, some as such for far too long, giving a poor impression.

If his motive is to deter people from Oxford, other than the residents, has he considered the impact from loss of employment and revenue that would ensue? The inspiration of the letter is the quoting (initially in the national press) of Oxford as the third most expensive for hotel accommodation: the comparisons are from the 'top of the range' market, via an Internet site.

This does not include the smaller independent business who strive, welcome tourism, charging less than £113, offering good value for money - refer to the current Welcome to Oxford 2008 guide at Oxford Information Centre in Broad Street, listing vetted accommodation, promoting the virtues of Oxford to travellers and businesses globally - adding considerably to our economy. Oxford is here to stay.

Pat Jones, River Hotel proprietor, Oxford