I didn't see the point of including conviction
I REFER to the article published on November 28, 2013 about the death of Graham Wood.
What on earth was the purpose of adding his misdemeanour of almost 30 years ago? Was this necessary? What was the point?
How insensitive.
I cannot believe that the Oxford Mail can have been so inconsiderate as to bring this information to light at this time. Is it of any relevance to an article about this sudden and tragic death? Where is the humanity and consideration for the bereaved family?
RUTH MARTIN Lyneham Road Bicester Editor’s note: The ‘misdemeanour’ referred to was the rape at knifepoint of a woman for which Mr Wood was given a nine-year jail sentence.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article