AFTER some comments on the issue I like to clarify that cyclists are only stationary when their wheels are not turning and someone who is not holding on to their handlebars whether stationary or not, is not in proper control of their bicycle.

There are two reasons why ‘tipper-style’ trucks are involved in such a large proportion of bicycle accidents, the first is that they are the type of HGV most commonly used in built-up residential areas, where there are lots of cyclists and the second is that they collect and drop their load from the rear.

This means that in the case of a skip or concrete lorry, they need to reverse into the area where their load is required.

Day after day, I see cyclists riding behind reversing lorries, apparently oblivious to the danger.

Some common sense is required.

Do not walk or cycle behind a reversing lorry.

If it is, in fact, the case that some cyclists are unaware or unable to see the danger, maybe it’s time to introduce compulsory cycle training for schools, colleges, universities and larger employers.

After all, lots of companies provide driver training to increase the safety of their employees.

Speed limiters are fitted to HGVs, which apply the brakes if the vehicle reaches a certain speed, could the system not be adapted to apply the brakes if movement is detected directly behind a reversing lorry?

Chris Smith

North Oxford Driving School