Letters RSS Feed


Speed camera cuts will cost us money


The debate over Speed cameras in Oxfordshire is being hijacked by ill-informed people who want to turn it into a war on drivers.

It is not, and here are some easily available facts to prove it: Speed cameras and driver education in the Thames Valley has helped cut deaths and serious injuries on our roads by 43 per cent.

Road deaths have fallen from 154 in 2000 to 89 (42 per cent) in 2008, while serious injuries fell from 1,213 to 767 (37 per cent) over the same period.

More than 40,000 motorists in the Thames Valley attended driver education courses last year instead of receiving fines and penalty points after breaking the law.

Driver education targets dangerous driving behaviour, with the result that women attendees were nearly 10 times less likely to break the 30mph speed limit, while male attendees said they were five times more likely to intend to stay within the limit.

A four-year study of UK speed cameras by the Government identified a £258m saving from avoided injuries compared to enforcement costs of £96m, so a net saving of £162m.

Department of Transport figures show that each fatal accident costs on average £1.9m, while each accident resulting in a serious injury costs on average £218,100.

Compare the £1.9m cost of a single road death with the £600,000 which Oxfordshire County Council wants to axe from the Thames Valley road safety programme and tell me it makes financial sense, let alone moral sense.

Deaths on Britain’s roads were at a record low last year thanks to initiatives like this, yet the World Health Organisation still lists road deaths as the top killer of young males aged 17 to 24, so there is still much to be done.

If the council axes the funding, all this will be undone and there will be more deaths and serious injuries on Oxfordshire’s roads – that is a fact.

Dani Rabinowitz, Somerville College, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford

Comments(6)

Bart Simpson1 says...
11:30am Wed 28 Jul 10

What a load of twaddle. Where does this university bumkin get her figures from, toyland?? 1.9 m cost for each death?? Figures picked from fairyland. The fall in deaths and accidents is not down to speed cameras. 40,000 attended driver education lessons, how many of these 40,000 were involved in accidents. NONE. Driver education does not target dangerous driving habbits. Going 6 miles over the speed limit at 2.00am is not dangerous driving. FACT, turning off the speeed cameras will not lead to more daths on the road.

Mick Heavey says...
12:10am Thu 29 Jul 10

''Where does this university bumkin get her figures from, toyland??''..... If you do your homework, Bart, I think you might find that 'she' is actually a 'he' !!!..... even if it is twaddle !

LadyPenelope says...
8:20am Thu 29 Jul 10

Time to step out of the text books and step into the real world where those of us with common sense understand how statistics can be manipulated to say anything!

thomashenry says...
9:34am Thu 29 Jul 10

Yes Lady Penelope, statistics are meaningless, let's just go with your gut feel on things eh?

BigAlBiker says...
8:23pm Thu 29 Jul 10

"Cost us money", like hell it will, it will save me some by not getting fined when i stray 1mph over the limit coming home from the pub late at night.

thomashenry says...
11:09am Fri 30 Jul 10

BigAlBiker wrote:
"Cost us money", like hell it will, it will save me some by not getting fined when i stray 1mph over the limit coming home from the pub late at night.
BigAlBiker - how many times have you been caught speeding? I don't think going 1mph over the limit will cause a camera to enagage.

I obey the speed limits at the moment because of the cameras, but when they are turned off I'm going to drive as fast as I jolly well like.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses