POLITICIANS constantly complain that the public do not trust them.
Perhaps this lack of trust could be linked to the astonishing abilities they have to utter total claptrap. Two examples spring to mind this week alone.
Cathy Jamieson, the justice minister, in defending herself against completely incredible allegations that she assisted a "criminal on the run" has a statement issued by a "spokesman". She admits that she gave a relative pounds-100. So far, no problem. Had the statement stopped there, no-one could even begin to question it. We have all helped family members. Some of us have pretty unsavoury relatives.
However, the statement goes on to say that she arranged for it to be paid into the relative's bank account to "ensure that it actually went to help that (relative's) newborn son and not as cash to be wasted on drink or drugs". Ms Jamieson surely cannot believe that to be true? In what way does putting money into someone's bank account ensure that it is spent in a particular fashion? Did Ms Jamieson believe that the bank would only release the funds by issuing vouchers to be spent in Mothercare?
That level of "we can tell the mugs anything and they'll believe it" was exceeded by Peter Hain. In a Commons debate on Monday, he was questioned about the Government's plans to introduce its new Anti Terrorism Bill. Mr. Robert MarshallAndrews suggested to him that the measures likely to be contained in the bill represented the greatest attack on the liberty of the British people for 300 years. Mr Hain rejected that notion.
"The greatest attack on civil liberties in Britain in 300 years would be a suicide terrorist attack right at the heart of our communities", opined the leader of the house.
Once again, how can any semiintelligent person begin to believe such utter rubbish? Does Mr Hain really expect us to believe that a single suicide bomber represents the greatest threat to our civil liberties in the last 300 years? Presumably when he was at school he did some history lessons.
Surely he might have remembered the Second World War. Britain under attack by nightly bombing raids from the Luftwaffe. Hitler's troops poised to invade. Are we really meant to believe that a suicide bomber represents a greater threat to our way of life than the Third Reich?
We might start trusting our political masters when they start living in the real world and stop trying to feed us a diet of fantasy and fairy-tales.
James Bauld, 12 Kingshill Drive, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article