TOURIST officials in Scotland will be casting envious eyes across the
sea this week, where the Irish Government has just announced a #IR650m
package to transform tourism over the next six years.
While the Scottish Tourist Board is trying to elicit more public money
for an ambitious exercise to overhaul our own industry, Mr Charlie
McCreevy, the Irish Tourism Minister, has promised solid financial and
logistical support for all aspects of the Irish trade.
A large chunk of the new money for Ireland -- #369m -- has come from
European coffers, with the private sector committing #199m, and the
Irish Government #84m.
The total purse will be split into five areas: #125m on natural and
cultural tourism, including waterways and national monuments; #287m on
product development, including individual tourism projects; #124m on
marketing; #110m on training, and #5m on technical assistance.
The Irish have already set and met a series of ambitious targets for
the industry between 1988 and last year, almost doubling revenue and
boosting the number of visitors from 2,090,000 to 3,110,000.
The targets were drawn up by the Government and the national tourism
body, Bord Failte. They managed to reverse years of decline and
stagnation and are now acknowldeged as having one of the most successful
tourism operations in Europe.
Mr Sean Gorman, spokesman for the Irish Department of Tourism and
Trade, said yesterday that the Government placed the highest value on
the industry, and acknowledged its role in the country's economy. Last
year, almost 8% of the workforce were employed in the tourism sector,
and it accounts for over 7% of the GNP.
''Tourism rates very highly in the pecking order of sectors to be
developed,'' Mr Gorman said. ''It is seen by the Government as having
significant growth potential. It rates very highly in the whole approach
of developing the economy here.''
A spokesman for the STB said it must be acknowledged that the industry
in Scotland had rallied behind the new national strategy to improve the
performance of the Scottish trade in the coming years.
However, he added: ''We believe we have a substantial marketing job to
do on behalf of Scotland. We believe we can't do that job on the
resources we have at the moment.
''It would be naive of us to expect that additional resources should
come from the Scottish Office without us articulating a case. That's a
case we are making at the moment.''
At present, the STB has an #8m marketing budget and gets #17.2m from
the Scottish Office.
The spokesman said, however, that Scotland had handled some aspects of
the industry better than the Irish and still attracted more visitors.
''The Irish are often presented as an example of what Scotland ought
to be doing, but the Irish have not always got everything right.''
Privately, tourism representatives in Scotland believe Ireland holds
an important trump card in its ability to negotiate in Europe as an
independent country.
''The chief executive of its tourist board can pick up the telephone
and speak to Mr Albert Reynolds, or directly to a Tourism Minister,''
said one Scottish industry analyst. ''In Scotland, tourist officials
have to work within the framework of the Government as it is currently
constituted.''
The Irish are also acknowledged at being excellent players of the
European game.
A spokesman for the Scottish Office confirmed it was paying #17.2m to
the STB at the moment, but pointed out that funding for tourism came
from local enterprise and local authority sources as well.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article