GOLF is said to be one of the few sports which can be enjoyed by the
incompetent, but it seems to be equalled by angling. The sensation of a
struggling fish at the end of the line may be electrifying, but it is a
thrill that some fishermen rarely enjoy. Calvin Coolidge, the thirtieth
American President, loved the sport, despite being bad at it. He
admitted that at his favourite haunt there were 45,000 trout he could
not catch, although he claimed to have intimidated them. Much the same
was true of the eighteenth-century scholar Thomas Birch, who hardly ever
caught a fish, despite disguising himself as a riverbank tree. His
disguise was so good that picnics were held at his feet, and it even
fooled dogs.
It is to be wondered what dedicated anglers will think of a new
product developed by Dr John Caprio, a neuro-physiologist at Louisiana
State University. During research on the brain of a catfish he found
that a combination of amino acids drove fish into a frenzy of hunger,
snapping and munching anything in range. The result has been Gotta Bite,
a superbait which when squirted into an aquarium causes fish to swallow
gravel, rocks, and even try to eat the glass. Dr Caprio's discovery has
been patented by his university, and a deal is being announced this week
with a manufacturing company. Not surprisingly it has caused dismay
among American anglers. Gotta Bite may take the frustration out of
fishing, they say, but in doing so it will also remove the pleasure.
An elegant solution may have been found 20 years ago, when the
National Ambulance Service held its angling contest at Kidderminster.
Some 200 ambulance men lined the local canal bank for five hours -- a
most enjoyable day, they said, despite not one of them having a bite. It
was only later that they learned that all the fish had been removed and
taken to other waters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article