ALONG with countless human lives, two millennia of Iranian history were destroyed yesterday.
The quake levelled more than half of Bam, laying ruin to its historic citadel that sits on a cliff above the city.
Built almost entirely out of mud bricks, clay straw and palm tree trunks, ancient Bam did not stand a chance.
The citadel - said to be the biggest mud brick structure in the world - included scores of ancient mud huts that were inhabited until the early 20th century.
It was believed to have been founded 2000 years ago and was an important visitor attractions. However, in the wake of yesterday's disaster, a large part of the spectacular fortified city, which sits on the outskirts of the vast Dasht-e Kavir desert, has been destroyed.
Its monuments, some of which dated from the 12th century, were contained within two square miles and surrounded by a formidable rampart with 38 towers.
Bam flourished as a site of pilgrimage and as a commercial centre during the Safavid period (1502-1722). Most of the terracotta skyline which sank to the sand yesterday is thought to date back to this era.
However, it was the city's location on the fabled Silk Road, a trading route which threaded from China, through Persia and Arabia, which transformed it into a thriving market place.
The period of prosperity, fuelled by the trade of exotic treasures from east to west, was stalled by an invasion by Afghans in 1722 and another by invaders from the region of Shiraz in 1810.
Serving as a military barracks until 1932, the citadel remained completely deserted apart from those involved in restoration work which began in 1953. Mounir Bouchenaki, a cultural heritage specialist with Paris-based Unesco, said his agency has contacted President Mohammad Khatami in hopes of dispatching an assessment team to the city.
''We will do our best to send the best experts to give their advice and support for the work of restoring this important site,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article