WOOLWORTHS, the high street sweets-to-homewares retailer, last night rejected an indicative pounds-789m takeover proposal from private equity group Apax Partners, saying it "does not provide acceptable value or certainty".
Apax made a 50p to 55p per-share proposal, subject to conditions including access to the chain's financial and trading information.
However, in a statement to the stock exchange after the market had closed, Woolies said its board, led by chief executive Trevor Bish-Jones, had given the proposal careful consideration but would not be recommending the bid.
It said: "(The board) has concluded that the range indicated does not provide acceptable value or certainty to justify entering into detailed discussions with Apax."
Analysts have said a fair valuation of the retailer, which demerged from Kingfisher in 2001, could be up to 60p per share.
Richard Ratner, of Seymour Pierce, said: "The indications I had from institutions is that having had a price of 60p mooted that was the price they wanted. However, the pressure is now on the (Woolworths') management to perform.
"We see the share price stabilising around the 42p to 43p level, as the company is effectively in play and companies do have a habit of not going back to the pre-bid levels."
Apax declined to comment on whether it would return to the 100-year-old retail chain with a higher offer.
Analysts believe further approaches from private equity players, or even supermarket chains like Tesco or Asda, cannot be ruled out as they look to expand their non-food retail space.
Private equity firms look to buy companies using mostly debt, before squeezing out maximum value and then selling for a hefty profit.
Woolworths is a more difficult target, as it has almost no freehold property that can be used to secure the debt that private equity players use to acquire their targets.
Shares in Woolworths firmed 0.25p to close at 48p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article