Three unknown species of bacteria found in the earth's atmosphere raise the prospect of life in space, scientists said today.
An Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) balloon found the bacteria in the upper stratosphere - 25 miles above the Earth's surface. The three species are resistant to ultra-violet radiation.
Although the study does not conclusively state so, it could mean there is life in space.
One of the new species is called Janibacter hoyle, after British astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle. The other two are Bacillus isro, in recognition of ISRO's contribution to the findings, and Bacillus aryabhata, after India's ancient scientist Aryabhata.
The balloon collected air samples at heights of 12 miles to 25 miles above the earth's surface and was later parachuted down to be retrieved.
C B S Dutt, the director of the project, said it had led to the identification of organisms able to live in such hostile conditions.
"The project has led to the identification of living organisms in the stratosphere to our knowledge for the first time," he told the Press Association.
"Before space, the living atmosphere for 20 kilometres (12.4 miles) is called the troposphere. Then comes the lower stratosphere followed by the upper stratosphere. These areas are not congenial for living organisms to survive due to the high level of ultra-violet radiation.
"The normal belief was that it is highly prohibitive for the survival of living organisms," he added.
This was the second such experiment conducted by ISRO. Though the earlier one yielded positive results, the organisation decided to repeat the experiment to ensure it was totally free from any terrestrial contamination.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article