HOW quickly City sentiment changes.
Cairn Energy, not so long ago one of the stock market's darlings, was savaged again yesterday by the money men.
The problem is the coveted but elusive Block 10 in Bangladesh.
The Bangladeshi government's indefinite postponement of awarding this acreage is seen as a major threat to the oil and gas independent's link-up with Shell.
There are worries that relations between Bangladesh's government and the Shell-Cairn joint venture have become distinctly frosty. And state-owned oil and gas company BOGMC's agreement on the reserves of Cairn's prized Sangu gas field is required before the ''daily contract quantity'' of gas to be delivered increases to the planned 200 million standard cubic feet per day.
Rumours that Shell is poised to pull out of Bangladesh may be mischief-making but, then again, they might reflect the international giant's displeasure with not for once getting what it wants.
But it is not all gloom and doom.
Sangu, which has proved one of the world's fastest offshore gas field developments, is up and running. Cairn has received payment for the first deliveries.
The different geology of Cairn's offshore acreage in Bangladesh should mean it has more potential than the onshore Halda field. Lessons will have been learned.
About three-and-a-half years ago, when Cairn shares were around 70p, chief executive Bill Gammell spelled out a vision in which Bangladesh was the key.
The company hit a gusher in Sangu and its shares rocketed.
The irrepressible Gammell remains upbeat about the prospects in offshore Bangladesh.
Cairn shares have been cut to about one-fifth of the peak they hit last year.
For the brave it might be a buying opportunity, but it is not for widows and orphans, or the faint-hearted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article