Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
7:55pm Sunday 31st January 2010 in
Former England fast bowler Alex Tudor has turned down the offer to play for Oxfordshire.
The 32-year-old had been offered a player-coach role by the Minor Counties side following his release by Surrey.
“Long deliberation and thought went into the decision,” he said. “The travelling was just going to be too much.
“I'm going to be playing club cricket in Nottingham on Saturday and the games for Oxfordshire start on Sunday. A lot of those are in the West Country.”
He added: “Something closer to home has come to fruition for the earlier part of the week which means I can spend more time with my daughter.
“The decision I came to wasn't easy. Speaking to the Oxfordshire committee they were obviously very keen, but I will have to decline.”
Tudor played ten Tests for England between 1998 and 2002, but saw his career blighted by a string of injuries.
As a bowler he took 220 first-class wickets at an average of 28.41 during two spells at Surrey.
Comments(22)
Fringe
says...
3:56pm Mon 1 Feb 10
Power
says...
4:00pm Mon 1 Feb 10
black socks
says...
4:37pm Mon 1 Feb 10
Santa Brooks
says...
8:19pm Mon 1 Feb 10
great shot
says...
3:10pm Fri 12 Feb 10
Cloth Donkey
says...
9:48pm Fri 12 Feb 10
Santa Brooks
says...
11:18pm Fri 12 Feb 10
davecherwell
says...
9:37am Sat 13 Feb 10
tuffers fan club
says...
10:19pm Sat 13 Feb 10
bowl-at-the-wickets
says...
9:39pm Sun 14 Feb 10
Phil J wrote:It seems you guys have alot to say in putting down the idea of getting Alex Tudor, saying he is a waste of money, but no real reasons as to why.
Phew, that was a close call. If ****ing money up the wall was part of the Oxfordshire County Cricket constitutional requirements having Alex Tudor would've been a perfect way to do it.
bowl-at-the-wickets
says...
9:45pm Sun 14 Feb 10
tuffers fan club wrote:i believe that the players are much better. How can they not be? They are playing against the best club plays across 3 counties rather than just the one. THe reason that oxfordshire didnt magically become best minor county since the HCPL has been introduced, is due to the introduction of regional premier league across the country for which players for the minor counties are predominatly picked. The standard on the whole will have improved.
lets be honest, are oxfordshire a stronger team now than they were pre hcpl. the mind boggles would the current crop be stand out players in div 1,2 of the cherwell.
Phil J
says...
12:45pm Mon 15 Feb 10
tuffers fan club
says...
1:12pm Mon 15 Feb 10
Coach111
says...
9:54am Tue 16 Feb 10
tuffers fan club
says...
1:28pm Wed 17 Feb 10
Coach111
says...
1:44pm Wed 17 Feb 10
tuffers fan club
says...
9:11pm Wed 17 Feb 10
Coach111
says...
8:28am Thu 18 Feb 10
davecherwell
says...
4:24pm Tue 23 Feb 10
bowl-at-the-wickets
says...
11:29am Thu 25 Feb 10
davecherwell wrote:div 2 is litter, that phase just seem familiar to me from somewhere!
tuffer's you're clearly someone who knows a lot about cricket. Perhaps you should run everything!!!!!
In house? well I'm a slight sceptic on the fact that the cherwell league is as good as you say. The premier league division one is clearly of a very good standard. Division two i agree is litter.
as for the cherwell league - well lets not beat around the bush its clearly village sticks.
As perhaps you are as a player. As the great arnie would say " talk is cheap"
Coach111
says...
3:19pm Fri 26 Feb 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find jobs in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire and find friendship
Search Now »
Find homes in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Cars for sale in and around Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Phil J says...
3:50pm Mon 1 Feb 10