THERE is and will be always "serious problems" with NHS funding (The Herald, June 2). The problem is simply that the NHS is a bottomless pit and there will never be enough. New treatments are being discovered all the time which are very expensive.
People, quite rightly, want the best for themselves and their loved ones but, sadly, this cannot be funded from taxation alone. Either we continue with a second-rate service or we have a grown-up debate about how to fund a superior service that would benefit everyone. I fear no politician would dare to put their name to such a proposal as they would see it as political suicide.
Short-termism prevails, as ever, in Britain.
Dr Robert McGonigle, Health Centre, Station Road, Dumbarton. Today's headline story on difficulties being experienced by the Scottish Government in healthcare funding has a rather interesting element. The item appears to have been provoked by analysis done by the Labour Party, and I quote: "Calculations for the Scottish Labour Party show that if the formula had been implemented in full this financial year, Ayrshire and Arran would have received £15m less, Greater Glasgow and Clyde £35m less and Highland £19m less."
Later in the article, it points out: "The new formula was devised by a committee set up by the last Labour administration called NRAC (NHS Scotland Resource Allocation Committee)."
Oops. Own goal anyone?
We must be very thankful in this instance that we have a new Health Secretary, Nicola Sturgeon, who assures us that "no board will receive less funding than it does at the moment".
Shouldn't that fact have been the headline?
David McEwan Hill, 1 Tom Nan Ragh, Dalinlongart, Argyll.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article