INTELLIGENCE and how to measure it is one of life's great contentious questions. We can be coached to pass exams, but how much does that say about our innate ability? We might outCarol Carol on the Countdown numbers game, but does that really qualify us as "good at maths"? And if someone is a prize-winning scientist but can't empathise with those who are not, do they deserve the label "genius"?
These questions are continually reassessed in the light of cultural and social change. The notion of emotional intelligence, for instance, has gained profile as the importance of communications in our globalised economy has increased. Traditional intelligence testing, meanwhile, has been overhauled due to suspicions of a cultural bias: how can someone from overseas compete fairly in a test which assumes you've been educated in the UK, for instance?
IQ testing, however, is more popular than ever. Psychometric tests for job applicants are still used in the UK, which gives job seekers an incentive to check out how they might do. Most people, however, are just curious to know where they fall in the general spread of intellectual ability.
Nathan Haselbauer is at the very top of that range. He has just celebrated his 30th birthday, but three years ago he retired as a trader on Wall Street to pursue the hobby that was taking over his life. Now it is an enjoyable business, even when he is up until the early hours devising fiendish puzzles to meet the deadline for his next book.
The latest, published in the UK by Robinson, comes out in February. Haselbauer is the founder and president of the International High IQ Society, which has nearly 11,000 members and which came into being when Haselbauer became frustrated with "the number of hoops you have to jump through to join Mensa". He looked instead for an online equivalent, which would provide instant test results.
There wasn't one, so he created his own, attracting like-minded young people who were more interested in sharing experiences on the internet at convenient times than turning out to local meetings. The pass rate for joining was set at 126, a level which, he says, puts members in the top 5-per cent of the population.
The International High IQ Society has now celebrated its fifth birthday. According to its founder, it is not a group of social misfits, although 78-per cent are men, most of them under 35.
The 500 puzzles contained in Haselbauer's latest book include 30 from the annual High IQ Society Goat (greatest of all time) challenge, which start tough and get tougher. Each year the person who scores most points claims the title of smartest person in the world. So far, nobody has achieved a perfect score and, of the hardest puzzles, only a handful of the 500,000 people who have tried them have answered any. Haselbauer and his problem-setters estimate that only one in every 400,000 people is in that league.
We've selected 12 puzzles from Haselbauer's new book for you to test yourself, with individual difficulty ratings between one and four. Good luck - and if you don't get the score you hoped for, you can always blame the test.
The Mammoth Book of IQ Puzzles is published on February 24 (Robinson, pounds-7.99). Visit the International High IQ Society website: www. highiqsociety. org
VOLUNTEERS' RESULTS
Roisin Clarke, 21 English literature graduate Score: 19 "I consider myself intelligent but I was surprised at how difficult I found it. That was mainly because it was biased towards numerical processes, I think. These tests would not measure verbal reasoning, creative skills or emotional intelligence."
Gary McNair, 18 Drama student Score: 25 "I would regard myself as being of above-average intelligence, but I found it a little bit stressful. Some of the puzzles were not very clearly worded. I don't think being able to put dots in a line is a real evaluation of intelligence."
Neil Gillies, 21 History student Score: 23 "It was mainly basic mathematics, so I don't think it was a comprehensive test of intelligence."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article