Witney RSS Feed


Whisky sale ban shocks soldier


A SOLDIER who had just arrived home from a tour of duty in Afghanistan was not allowed to buy a bottle of whisky in a supermarket because his step-daughter was with him.

Sergeant Keith Cotton, who is on leave before returning to his Royal Logistic Corps unit’s base in Northern Ireland, was shocked when a cashier at Carterton’s Co-operative supermarket refused to sell him the spirit while he was shopping with 15-year-old Krystal Mitchell.

The Co-op last night apologised to Sgt Cotton for any embarrassment.

The cashier told him she could not let him buy a bottle of Whyte & Mackay Scotch whisky because his daughter did not have any identification with her.

Sgt Cotton, of Upavon Way, Carterton, said: “I was shocked. I have never complained about anything in my life before. I’m not a person who gripes.

“It was common sense, as it was pretty obvious it was for me. Does this mean anyone else buying alcohol while with their children isn’t allowed to?”

The father-of-four added: “I was in a good, chirpy mood and it really ruined my evening.

“I really thought it was a wind-up and that somebody would jump out... like a Jeremy Beadle moment.”

The incident happened last Wednesday, as Sgt Cotton was shopping in the town centre with Krystal.

The 40-year-old said: “I went to the self-service counter and proceeded to put my goods through the scanner. My daughter picked up the first two items and scanned them herself, a carton of milk and a packet of sweets, and then I took over.

“As I did so, the cashier called to me that she wanted to see ID for my daughter. I laughed at her, thinking she was messing around, so I continued to scan the goods. Just as I was about to pay, the woman asked to see age verification for my daughter again and I still thought she was winding me up.

“It soon became apparent she was serious.”

Lorna Bishop, a spokesman for the Botley-based Midcounties Co-operative, said: “As a responsible community retailer, we have strict procedures on alcohol sales.

“If we suspect a customer is under 25 years old we will ask for proof of age identification and if we have suspicion that the purchase is being made for someone else, we’re legally bound to refuse the sale.

“We apologise if this has caused any embarrassment but we’re legally required to refuse such a sale.”

Sgt Cotton was not in uniform when he went in the shop, but military personnel are allowed to buy alcohol from shops while wearing Army kit.

However, they are not permitted to buy alcohol from pubs or bars, or drink while in uniform.

Sgt Cotton added: “I understand that there’s a problem with people buying alcohol by proxy but I’m a serving senior non-commissioned officer in the Army.

“After recently returning from Afghanistan I can’t believe the jobsworthiness of this woman, as it was plain to see I was doing a normal shop, like all the other thousands of people every day do with their children present.

“I even offered to take Krystal home and come back later on my own, but they said I couldn’t do that either.”

witney@oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(9)

Quentin Walker says...
7:00pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Sadly, I'm not surprised. The country is in the grip of mental defectives.

Read this quickly - the OM will delete it (non-PC).

mx5 says...
7:06pm Wed 17 Mar 10

So if want to by a bottle of wine and there happens to be a random person under 18 somewhere else in the shop, does that mean I 'might' be buying the wine for that random person. Obviously the only solution is to ID every person entering a shop where alcohol can be purchased and if they are under age then don't let them in! Supermarkets could lose a lot of custom if they continue to behave in this stupid and irrational way. Common sense seems to have disappeared.

Nicholas Nickleby ESQ says...
7:33pm Wed 17 Mar 10

Does this mean that when buying our usual Sunday lunch tipple we will have to leave our 18 month old twins in the car?

LittleBrother says...
7:50pm Wed 17 Mar 10

I admire and respect our armed forces and the amazing work they do.

As he was not in uniform at the time then I fail to see his profession being relevant to this story.

Why have the Oxford mail chosen to feature his profession (and take a picture of him in his uniform!) so heavily?

Cynical, moi?

Harsh@home says...
9:51am Thu 18 Mar 10

As he wasn't in uniform and was just a member of the public he could well have been buying the whiskey on behalf of the girl.

Pierre My says...
12:27pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Even though the O.M. exploited his uniform for journalistic reasons, the point of the story is very worrying. What is next, you can't buy a packet of fags if your kids are with you, or your box of burgers and bag of chicken nuggets are confiscated because they are junk food?. The law states that you have to be over 18 to purchase alcohol, clearly this bloke is, so why the refusal. It is about time we started standing up for our rights, because slowly and surely they are being taken away from us, and we are being dictated to from the government right down to the checkout girl, is this what living in a democracy is all about?. If it is give me a dictatorship anyday, at least we will know what to expect.

Andrew:Oxford says...
12:49pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Is there an opportunity for libel action against an organisation or even the individual working for the organisation if they publically allege that you intend to supply alcohol to a minor?

Tom Cranmer says...
10:23pm Thu 18 Mar 10

Unfortunately it's a sign of the times. I am still a licencee although I am (thankfully) no longer a DPS. All off sale retailers now have to operate under the "Challenge 25" banner to have a license to sell alcohol - and yes, it does apply to tobacco products, solvents, knives and lottery tickets too. If a store is found to be in breach of these regulations, they lose their license. One of the most stringent checks local authorities operate is proxy sales. This is when an adult may be purchasing alcohol for a minor, like my dad did for me in the pub! And it does say the minor was scanning the goods herself whilst he was not at the till, which would give someone grounds for suspicion. Shops are having to be increasingly vigilant, and do tend to be over zealous. They don't mean to offend you, but they're scared they'll lose their license, I've been subjected to Challenge 25 errors myself (with toddlers!), but saw the funny side.

online_reader says...
8:54am Fri 19 Mar 10

If I am challenged at the checkout while buying alcohol with my large expensive weekly shop, I leave the lot there and let them put it all away. I do not look under 18 and I am incensed by the suggestion that I might abuse my children by buying them alcohol. If a shop accuses me of child abuse, I do not see why I should give them my custom.


Sgt Keith Cotton and Krystal Mitchell outside Carterton Co-op, where he was told he could not buy a bottle of Scotch because staff thought he might give the spirit to his step-daughter Sgt Keith Cotton and Krystal Mitchell outside Carterton Co-op, where he was told he could not buy a bottle of Scotch because staff thought he might give the spirit to his step-daughter

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses