Concerned residents call for a masterplan

A SUMMIT meeting of Headington residents’ associations has been held to voice concern about looming development in the area.

They have called for development in the area to be brought to a halt until a masterplan is drawn up.

The public meeting was called days before a planning inspector hears the arguments for and against Oxford City Council ’s development plans for the coming decades.

Residents claim Headington has been plagued by traffic and by water bursts in recent years and many of the institutions based in the area seek to expand.

Oxford Brookes University is currently building its new campus in Gipsy Lane while Oxford University is expanding its Old Road campus.

The John Radcliffe Hospital opened its West Wing and Children’s Hospital in 2008 and is hoping to build a multi-million pound extension for a new reception area.

These sites as well as others in the area have been earmarked for further development in the council’s sites and housing development plan document.

Finch Close resident Harry Edwards, a member of Highfield Residents’ Association, said the meeting was held to discuss the concerns. He said: “We have come to the conclusion that we need a planning document because of the cluster of sites in Headington.

Related links

“Each plan is currently being looked at in isolation. “I am not against development but there needs to be a strategy and we need to feel that the issues are being properly addressed.”

About 10 residents’ associations were represented including Highfield Residents’ Association, the Jack Straws Lane Association and Friends of Quarry.

On Thursday evening the various residents associations of Headington gathered together to discuss the issue before the inquiry into the sites and housing DPD begins on Monday.

Headington city councillor Ruth Wilkinson said: “A huge surge of development has taken place in Headington over the last decade yet residents feel their community needs have been overlooked.

“There is nothing in the planning documents to specifically address the parking, transport, planning and infrastructure problems that have increased over that time.

“A strategic Headington masterplan is needed right now.”

As well as problems with traffic in Headington, there have been frequent problems with water pipes bursting, with about 2,000 customers having their supply cut off in July.

And last month Thames Water said the city’s infrastructure may not be able to cope with the hundreds of homes planned by the city council.

Council spokesman Louisa Dean said the authority was not looking at new developments in isolation.

She said: “The sites and housing plan looks at the infrastructure needs of the area and expects the major sites to deliver improvements, particularly to transport, as part of their development.

“The Old Road campus, John Radcliffe Hospital and the Churchill Hospital already have masterplans in development by the University of Oxford and NHS Trust and these will be expected to consider the wider traffic and infrastructure impacts of the development.”

Comments (8)

7:56pm Sat 8 Sep 12

Andrew:Oxford says...

It's all very well demanding a "Masterplan"...

But what happens if they residents don't like it?
It's all very well demanding a "Masterplan"... But what happens if they residents don't like it? Andrew:Oxford

11:07pm Sat 8 Sep 12

train passenger says...

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
It's all very well demanding a "Masterplan"...


But what happens if they residents don't like it?
Same old, the masterplan is simply a tactic in the 'I am not against development, but...' line of reasoning - anywhere but near me.
[quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: It's all very well demanding a "Masterplan"... But what happens if they residents don't like it?[/p][/quote]Same old, the masterplan is simply a tactic in the 'I am not against development, but...' line of reasoning - anywhere but near me. train passenger

6:40am Sun 9 Sep 12

Christine Hovis says...

Just look at the example of the three sites clustered by Old Road.

There's development on the Old Road Campus itself, then the Park Hospital site, and there's more to come at the Churchill.

The Planners can't say 'no' to aspects of the first, because they know the other two are coming, and they won't be able to say 'no' to aspects of the third as that isn't their fault. So just on traffic planning - Old Road is no longer coping with the traffic, and there are thousands more jobs going on those sites in the next few years. Enforcing a few cycle shelters on each of the sites won't help. It needs a Masterplan.

The Planning Inspector thought so. What's the objection to this from the City?
Just look at the example of the three sites clustered by Old Road. There's development on the Old Road Campus itself, then the Park Hospital site, and there's more to come at the Churchill. The Planners can't say 'no' to aspects of the first, because they know the other two are coming, and they won't be able to say 'no' to aspects of the third as that isn't their fault. So just on traffic planning - Old Road is no longer coping with the traffic, and there are thousands more jobs going on those sites in the next few years. Enforcing a few cycle shelters on each of the sites won't help. It needs a Masterplan. The Planning Inspector thought so. What's the objection to this from the City? Christine Hovis

11:05am Sun 9 Sep 12

Geoff Roberts says...

The whole of this city is a planning disaster quite frankly. Communities are being squeezed left, right and centre. As a result I think our traditional communities are no longer sustainable, they will be extinct. Building houses tends to be about how many leases you can create on one piece of land in order to make money. Every time a University expands it permanently takes away use of the land for the community, worse than that, it takes away income for us to make our communities better. It's an absolute disaster and as a result the poorest will continue to be pushed to the side lines, divided, literally by roads which carry people who see those roads as simply being a means for them to drive somewhere, not communities. I think it's a simple fact that this city is not made for this amount of people or cars and it will never be able to sustain it. We are destroying ourselves from within because we keep voting for the same people to keep control or not doing anything about it at all.

We are in desperate times, not just this city but the entire country, instead we just carry on, business as usual.
The whole of this city is a planning disaster quite frankly. Communities are being squeezed left, right and centre. As a result I think our traditional communities are no longer sustainable, they will be extinct. Building houses tends to be about how many leases you can create on one piece of land in order to make money. Every time a University expands it permanently takes away use of the land for the community, worse than that, it takes away income for us to make our communities better. It's an absolute disaster and as a result the poorest will continue to be pushed to the side lines, divided, literally by roads which carry people who see those roads as simply being a means for them to drive somewhere, not communities. I think it's a simple fact that this city is not made for this amount of people or cars and it will never be able to sustain it. We are destroying ourselves from within because we keep voting for the same people to keep control or not doing anything about it at all. We are in desperate times, not just this city but the entire country, instead we just carry on, business as usual. Geoff Roberts

11:25am Sun 9 Sep 12

Andrew:Oxford says...

Christine Hovis wrote:
Just look at the example of the three sites clustered by Old Road.

There's development on the Old Road Campus itself, then the Park Hospital site, and there's more to come at the Churchill.

The Planners can't say 'no' to aspects of the first, because they know the other two are coming, and they won't be able to say 'no' to aspects of the third as that isn't their fault. So just on traffic planning - Old Road is no longer coping with the traffic, and there are thousands more jobs going on those sites in the next few years. Enforcing a few cycle shelters on each of the sites won't help. It needs a Masterplan.

The Planning Inspector thought so. What's the objection to this from the City?
So really, your "masterplan" would be to demand that no new jobs are created in Oxford?

I'm not sure if any planning inspector would survive the national political thrashing that an official city job moratorium would bring.
[quote][p][bold]Christine Hovis[/bold] wrote: Just look at the example of the three sites clustered by Old Road. There's development on the Old Road Campus itself, then the Park Hospital site, and there's more to come at the Churchill. The Planners can't say 'no' to aspects of the first, because they know the other two are coming, and they won't be able to say 'no' to aspects of the third as that isn't their fault. So just on traffic planning - Old Road is no longer coping with the traffic, and there are thousands more jobs going on those sites in the next few years. Enforcing a few cycle shelters on each of the sites won't help. It needs a Masterplan. The Planning Inspector thought so. What's the objection to this from the City?[/p][/quote]So really, your "masterplan" would be to demand that no new jobs are created in Oxford? I'm not sure if any planning inspector would survive the national political thrashing that an official city job moratorium would bring. Andrew:Oxford

7:47pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Lord Palmerstone says...

@lordpetermcvey wrote:
With all the objections, and the rate that affordable and social housing is being built, there is going to be serious trouble. I wouldn't like to be in charge of housing in ten years time.
You won't. You seem to be quite bright and amusing so there ain't a chance. An apparatchik will be in charge and it/s/he will still bang on about "affsocial" blah blah when presumably the subject is public housing.
But enough of that, how's about this? "Sir Tony Baldry's car crashes into shop... and toilet"
I'm only 64 , so I guess it'll be 10 years before I can do what he did. But then-maybe I can become an MP-68K a year and more ex's than I could possibly use.Do you want to share them LPMV?
[quote][p][bold]@lordpetermcvey[/bold] wrote: With all the objections, and the rate that affordable and social housing is being built, there is going to be serious trouble. I wouldn't like to be in charge of housing in ten years time.[/p][/quote]You won't. You seem to be quite bright and amusing so there ain't a chance. An apparatchik will be in charge and it/s/he will still bang on about "affsocial" blah blah when presumably the subject is public housing. But enough of that, how's about this? "Sir Tony Baldry's car crashes into shop... and toilet" I'm only 64 , so I guess it'll be 10 years before I can do what he did. But then-maybe I can become an MP-68K a year and more ex's than I could possibly use.Do you want to share them LPMV? Lord Palmerstone

9:19pm Sun 9 Sep 12

Myron Blatz says...

Doesn't City Council and Labour Leader Cllr Bob Price work for Brookes - surely a 'conflict of interest' if ever there was?
Doesn't City Council and Labour Leader Cllr Bob Price work for Brookes - surely a 'conflict of interest' if ever there was? Myron Blatz

8:13am Mon 10 Sep 12

bart-on simpson says...

Strange how HRA gets onto the Barton and Northway Working Committee and then doesn't return the favour... Bissy bodies who seem who want to live in their 1950s idyll, with new top cop Martin Young keeping the peace...
Strange how HRA gets onto the Barton and Northway Working Committee and then doesn't return the favour... Bissy bodies who seem who want to live in their 1950s idyll, with new top cop Martin Young keeping the peace... bart-on simpson

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree