Oxford RSS Feed


Scrap Westgate redevelopment in favour of building homes, say Greens

Green party member Sushila Dhall outside the Westgate Centre, which she says should be turned into affordable housing Green party member Sushila Dhall outside the Westgate Centre, which she says should be turned into affordable housing

OXFORD Greens yesterday demanded plans to redevelop the Westgate Centre should be dumped in favour of hundreds of affordable homes because people were not “clamouring” for the £330m scheme.

The plea came as senior Labour councillors on Oxford City Council are today expected to agree to the latest negotiations for Crown Estate and the Land Securities Group to regenerate the centre.

Oxford Green party chairman Sushila Dhall said: “We don’t hear people clamouring for more car parking or chain stores.

“What we see is the desperate shortage of affordable housing in Oxford.”

But yesterday shoppers and the chamber of commerce said the city was in desperate need of a redeveloped Westgate to try to reclaim its prime position as a retail centre.

The long-awaited redevelopment is to include a John Lewis department store and a small amount of housing, with the latest hope of building starting in 2014 and it potentially opening in 2017.

But Ms Dhall said any redevelopment should include affordable homes and small independent shops.

She said: “It is on public land, originally built with public money, and giving it to chain stores is giving it to private sector hands.”

David Williams, leader of the Green group on the city council, said up to 400 homes could be built on the site.

He said: “The days of grand malls are over. In the last few years more and more people are buying online.

“People’s shopping habits are changing.”

Nigel Wild, president of Oxfordshire Chamber of Commerce, said the Greens’ idea was “ill thought out”.

He said: “It is vital it is a shopping site. There is space around the city for houses.

“This is a prime shopping location. It will draw people to Oxford and creates jobs in Oxford.”

City council leader Bob Price said the Greens’ idea was unrealistic.

Jeremy Ginaud, of Breton Crepe Company which trades outside the Westgate, said nearby shopkeepers would benefit from a better shopping centre. He said: “It looks old.”

An agreement is expected to be made at a closed session of the city executive this afternoon which will hand developer Westgate Oxford Alli-ance Partnership, a 100-year lease of the site and car parks.

Are the Greens right? Vote online at oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(40)

JPOX28 says...
10:42am Wed 8 Feb 12

Yeh go ahead lose even more people to us (Witney), Didcot And Bicester.

Oxford is not a prime shopping location anymore. And wont be unless the right development is built.

Small scale wont work. Take note of what Milton Keynes and Reading have done!!!!

Major Rhode-Werks says...
11:11am Wed 8 Feb 12

Oxford will never be a prime shopping location while I can drive to Witney in 20 mins, park for free and wander round a really nice town without having to jump out of the way of cyclists or being pushed and shoved by gangs of language students.
Maybe if the flood gates hadn't been opened to all and sundry we wouldn't have quite such a housing shortage anyway.

farfrom_united says...
11:33am Wed 8 Feb 12

I do sympathise with some of the Green Party policies but they really need to pick their fights without making themselves look ridiculous and a laughing stock.

Oxford is in dire need of improvement, not just to improve the experience of coming to the centre for locals and the people that work here but also at managing the tens of thousands of people that visit. The new centre may not be a silver bullet for all of these problems, but it has to help. Apart from the pedestrianisation of Cornmarket, no one has really addressed these issues for decades.

adfoz says...
11:56am Wed 8 Feb 12

Hahaha, this article made me laugh. This is why the green party will never get anywhere...

McDave says...
12:31pm Wed 8 Feb 12

So with these affordable homes, that won't be affordable as they are in the centre of town, where are the people going to work? The whole point of suburbs is that people can live there away from the hustle and bustle of a town centre but can still easily travel there for work or leisure.

Oxford taxpayer says...
1:58pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Could not agree more sparky.

Bogdan The MeerKat says...
2:17pm Wed 8 Feb 12

After reading this article I checked the date to make sure it wasn't April Fools day.

Mona2 says...
2:27pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Sushila Dahll - I am so glad she doesn't represent me. Cloudcuckooland.

Mullarkian says...
3:02pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Shut up and eat your 'greens'.

davyboy says...
3:51pm Wed 8 Feb 12

i hate shopping in oxford, and would rather go to MK or Reading. most major towns and cities have redeveloped their shopping centres, seemingly with the exception of Oxford. if houses are needed, and i'm sure they are, they should not be built in the centre, but on the outskirts, where families can have some space to live in without being squashed together.

LORD PETE MCVAY. OX2 6EG says...
4:25pm Wed 8 Feb 12

davyboy wrote:
i hate shopping in oxford, and would rather go to MK or Reading. most major towns and cities have redeveloped their shopping centres, seemingly with the exception of Oxford. if houses are needed, and i'm sure they are, they should not be built in the centre, but on the outskirts, where families can have some space to live in without being squashed together.
If houses were to be built on that site, you can be sure that they will be only for those that can afford seven figures, there aint no way that poor people will be living there.

Patrick in Devon says...
4:37pm Wed 8 Feb 12

How about something more radical - move St Peters College and Nuffield College and build a shopping centre there, with easy access to the station?

GaryOxford says...
5:48pm Wed 8 Feb 12

Oxford is in dire need of a regenerated shopping centre AND housing. If the Greens want to take people with them they need to propose a scheme that accomplishes both needs, not one instead of the other.
Also Oxford doesn't need more affordable housing, it needs housing to become affordable, there's a crucial difference.

mandate says...
7:43am Thu 9 Feb 12

I think that Oxford is in need of a total revamp. It is a tragedy that our famous city is so outdated with regards to it's limited shopping facilities. A new Westgate centre would be a good start.

With regards to the huge housing shortage. The solution could be to build attractive high rise apartments on the outskirts of the city. Naturally these would have to be built with consideration to the Oxford skyline.

In Leeds they have some really bright and modern tower blocks. These do not in anyway make the city look ugly.

Building these in Oxford would be an ideal solution for students and young people. This would also free up the many houses that are currently being rented by students. These vacated houses could then be rented to families.

Sid Hunt says...
8:37am Thu 9 Feb 12

"Oxford Green party chairman Sushila Dhall said: “We don’t hear people....."

xjohnx says...
9:54am Thu 9 Feb 12

Seems to me, Oxford makes a lot of money from its 'old' buildings. Why change things for change sake. Housing is badly needed and developers will always clamour to build more shops. I think the West Gate site could easily be left alone without damaging the town at all.

Gunslinger says...
10:22am Thu 9 Feb 12

JPOX28 wrote:
Yeh go ahead lose even more people to us (Witney), Didcot And Bicester.

Oxford is not a prime shopping location anymore. And wont be unless the right development is built.

Small scale wont work. Take note of what Milton Keynes and Reading have done!!!!
And note that both of those towns have included improved and adequate car parking as part of those developments. The smaller towns now have short term 'free' parking to encourage shoppers.
Oxford seem to have been obsessive about keeping cars out at any cost, and indeed treating car parking as an 'easy' source of income (where else charges £1.50 to Park and Ride?).

EMBOX1 says...
10:39am Thu 9 Feb 12

The Greens have the best of intentions, but are on another planet. They need to work with the Government of the day to push their agenda, but never be allowed to govern, or we will all be paying £50 a litre for petrol.

mattyproper77 says...
11:18am Thu 9 Feb 12

Not everyone wants/needs to live in suburbs, high density inner urban areas are safe and can help the local economic ecology. more people, more cool stuff going on. I think this article has been poorly drafted, it's highly possible something really interesting could be designed, which features a combination of lots of different uses (single use 'quarters' are relatively recent concept, and are often inappropriate), and it's a bit simplistic to envisage a new Greater Leys emerging on the Westgate site. The Green Party's comments on changing shopping habits are very pertinent, has noone been paying any attention to the coverage being given to the 'death' of the high street? New thinking is required, the '60s paradigm that the Westgate emerged from is no longer the best solution. I'm struggling to see why it is so bad to have housing on the site anyway, given that St Ebbes was traditionally high density housing/industry until the 1960s anyway, and the large number of people living in the city centre already - what's the problem? The Westgate has always been an absolute hole as long as I can remember (child of 80s/90s), and Oxpens has been poorly thought out as a whole, it needs a fresh look, ideally setting the foundations for organic growth rather than wholesale utopian development, which just disappoints. As for those who prefer Reading over Oxford.....I have no words.

mattyproper77 says...
11:25am Thu 9 Feb 12

PS all this should be placed in the context that life is going to get very very bumpy in near future - all those jobs lost? they are never coming back. public will have less to spend. petrol? it's just going to get more expensive, so whining about not having parking is going to be a bit redundant, and it's not because of East Oxford muesli terrorists, it's because there's less oil, and the bits still around UK has to kill people for, so it costs more. residential development? private market has totally, totally failed, an army of homeless families is currently emerging that will make Cathy Come Home look like good old days, so if you're not going to tolerate Mad Max III on Queen Street, we need new homes built with public assistance. Sorry if this sounds like fantasy, I just couldn't help having a peek at some of the realities.

mattyproper77 says...
12:16pm Thu 9 Feb 12

PPS what is so great about current scheme design?

sparky123456 says...
1:52pm Thu 9 Feb 12

dear oxford mail. care to explain why my post, which focussed purely on the article without prejudice or abuse has been removed??? someone on your staff in league with the Green Party and doesn't like the truth??

charlie8386 says...
5:54pm Thu 9 Feb 12

I live about 7 miles from Oxford and never go there If I can help it. Shops are rubbish, tourists just get in your way and the streets are crowded. I spend just over half a hour going to Banbury shopping instead, it so much better for shopping!.

oafie says...
7:12pm Thu 9 Feb 12

What'sthe pinjt in more shops for God's sake,and even if jobs are created, those that are paid Retail wages won't be able to live in the city and so on the problem goes.

Affordable housing for those that need it and parking with realistic charges would bring more shoppers in without the need for more shops.

oafie says...
7:14pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Oh dear lord my spelling!!

Victor Meldrew2 says...
9:15pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Spending money on a redeveloped Westgate is a complete waste of money simply because the like of Bob Price have made it so financially unattractive to park or attempt to shop in Oxford - it's too late now, people have found other places to shop - a City destroyed for residents by their representitives.

Andrew:Oxford says...
11:17pm Thu 9 Feb 12

Victor Meldrew2 wrote:
Spending money on a redeveloped Westgate is a complete waste of money simply because the like of Bob Price have made it so financially unattractive to park or attempt to shop in Oxford - it's too late now, people have found other places to shop - a City destroyed for residents by their representitives.
You're forgetting that the City Council have sold their interest in the Westgate Car Park to the developers.

Unless there is some secret restrictive covenant, the shopping centre owner will be free to charge a suitable market rate for parking.

The council will be getting a "turn" on the retail turnover of the shops instead.

simplicissimus says...
11:07am Fri 10 Feb 12

mandate wrote:
I think that Oxford is in need of a total revamp. It is a tragedy that our famous city is so outdated with regards to it's limited shopping facilities. A new Westgate centre would be a good start.

With regards to the huge housing shortage. The solution could be to build attractive high rise apartments on the outskirts of the city. Naturally these would have to be built with consideration to the Oxford skyline.

In Leeds they have some really bright and modern tower blocks. These do not in anyway make the city look ugly.

Building these in Oxford would be an ideal solution for students and young people. This would also free up the many houses that are currently being rented by students. These vacated houses could then be rented to families.
Yes.

Pyropete says...
3:10pm Fri 10 Feb 12

Yeah well done Greens.... Don't build a shopping centre. Then we'll all use our big cars to drive to MK or Reading!
Even better build more homes so even more people can drive out of town for a good shop.
Clueless!

Dilligaf2010 says...
4:32pm Fri 10 Feb 12

"Also Oxford doesn't need more affordable housing, it needs housing to become affordable, there's a crucial difference.".....
......Got a good point there GaryOxford

Chilaili says...
5:07pm Fri 10 Feb 12

I don't really care what they build there as long as the carpark doesn't cost a fortune like it used to! It's ridiculous that a shopping trip to centre of Oxford has to factor in nearly £20 for parking.

greengarden says...
8:40pm Fri 10 Feb 12

not sure if any Ox City councillors read these forums. But I have lived in Oxford all my life, but for the last 5 years have refused to be ripped off by shopping in Oxford. Car parking charges, lots of coffee shops and not a lot else. We drive to Reading or Cheltenham for shopping. I just wish so much that our councillors would wake up and reaslise that they are slowing killing all commerce & investment in Oxford. I would like to see a poll of who actually shops in Oxford outside of tourists and students (and nothing wrong with them), but how many local people visit our historic center. Because most people I know will now travel elsewhere...... Car parking at Oracle in Reading 6+ hours £12 & lots of quality shops as well in a superb shopping environment, Oxford it would cost you £21.70!!

mattyproper77 says...
1:46pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Pyropete wrote:
Yeah well done Greens.... Don't build a shopping centre. Then we'll all use our big cars to drive to MK or Reading!
Even better build more homes so even more people can drive out of town for a good shop.
Clueless!
You would rather see what? The existing scheme is ideal? The US model of anchor stores is guaranteed to work? Move to Reading or Milton Keynes?

mattyproper77 says...
10:18pm Sat 11 Feb 12

Why are people blaming OCC for retail failure? ALL DEVELOPMENT IS PRIVATELY FUNDED. The Westgate hasn't been redeveloped yet because the applicants don't believe they can secure an adequate financial return at the present time, they couldn't give a monkey's about the people of Oxford. All this article states is that the Green Party raised the idea of revisiting the planning application - which has ALREADY BEEN GRANTED - as there is little chance of anything happening at the current time. You are witnessing market failure, in terms of the commercial offer and the lack of affordable housing, and still you people blame OCC. I guess parking rates could change, but I'm pretty sure pressure to reduce all other rates is so extreme, as people don't like paying taxes, that this is one way of raising finance for other services. The council can only legislate on USE CLASS, pretty much everything else is left to market forces. We have the free market you want, and this is what you get, so enjoy it and keep buying all that useless tat on your credit cards.

LORD PETE MCVAY. OX2 6EG says...
1:15am Sun 12 Feb 12

sparky123456 wrote:
dear oxford mail. care to explain why my post, which focussed purely on the article without prejudice or abuse has been removed??? someone on your staff in league with the Green Party and doesn't like the truth??
It seems like anything resembling the truth is deleted. Just be thankful it was only your post and not your account.

LORD PETE MCVAY. OX2 6EG says...
1:28am Sun 12 Feb 12

mattyproper77 wrote:
Why are people blaming OCC for retail failure? ALL DEVELOPMENT IS PRIVATELY FUNDED. The Westgate hasn't been redeveloped yet because the applicants don't believe they can secure an adequate financial return at the present time, they couldn't give a monkey's about the people of Oxford. All this article states is that the Green Party raised the idea of revisiting the planning application - which has ALREADY BEEN GRANTED - as there is little chance of anything happening at the current time. You are witnessing market failure, in terms of the commercial offer and the lack of affordable housing, and still you people blame OCC. I guess parking rates could change, but I'm pretty sure pressure to reduce all other rates is so extreme, as people don't like paying taxes, that this is one way of raising finance for other services. The council can only legislate on USE CLASS, pretty much everything else is left to market forces. We have the free market you want, and this is what you get, so enjoy it and keep buying all that useless tat on your credit cards.
You just killed your argument about market forces. Other Towns have big comfortable shopping centres because they make their clients (shoppers) feel welcome. Here we make them feel persecuted, by fining them if they happen to stray into one of the restricted areas, by creating artificial traffic jams that cause them to spend a lot of time wasted, and then charging over £20 to park for the day. No wonder the parties involved will not take a risk on the new centre. If this is to change then the persecution of the motorist has to stop. The traffic lights and road junctions need to be tweaked back, to allow traffic to flow, parking needs to be at a cost price, and not used as an exhorbitant tax, and a serious re-think by the powers that be is needed to ensure that P.C. nonsense is not allowed to dictate policy. Then, and only then can we have a new centre that will attract people away from other "friendly" shopping destinations. But then again maybe our leaders are happy to have hoards of people cramming our city centre spending £4 on a Skinny Latte and Lentil Baguette, but not much else.

mattyproper77 says...
12:39pm Sun 12 Feb 12

McVay, you are a troll and I claim my £5. You are saying the ONLY reason the centre hasn't been built is the parking charges? What is PC nonsense?

mattyproper77 says...
3:43pm Sun 12 Feb 12

...driving cars running on imported middle eastern petrol, to buy chinese made consumer goods with what? Change the roads and the traffic just grows and back where we started? City centres should be designed exclusively for motorists? 'Clients'? You are living in the fantasy past, your time is over. Have a dose of reality, flick on the TV news and watch Athens and know that is coming to a street near you within 12 months, and a new H&M isn't going to change that

John Lamb says...
12:54am Mon 13 Feb 12

People on the waiting list for houses in the Cherwell district may be interested to hear that people on the latest housing development in Yarnton are actually being rehoused in very scarce social housing (subsidised by the government at around 40% of the market rent value) even though they were in houses they had bought.
They are now in the fortunate position of living in an ultra-modern house with all repairs paid for and being able to rent out their old houses and pocket the cash.
Plus they can sell their houses and pocket that cash too.
All thanks to something called the Ruarl Exemption Scheme/Yarnton parish Council and the housing department at Cherwell Council.
With over 3000 on the housing list it does seem...er.....strang
e doesn't it?
Try and ask them why they're giving out social housing to those with their own houses and see if YOU can get an answer....I can't.

LORD PETE MCVAY. OX2 6EG says...
7:24pm Mon 13 Feb 12

mattyproper77 wrote:
McVay, you are a troll and I claim my £5. You are saying the ONLY reason the centre hasn't been built is the parking charges? What is PC nonsense?
ERR do you actually read posts or just one word and then make inane comments? I make a few reasons why it won't be built AND successful.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree