Oxford RSS Feed


Heatwave caused surge in pollution in Oxford

LEVELS of air pollution in Oxford soared above Government safety levels during the hottest Easter weekend for 30 years.

Under European Union targets, the level of nitrogen dioxide should not exceed 200 micrograms per cubic metre more than 18 times a year.

But levels reached closer to 300 micrograms per cubic metre in Oxford city centre on Thursday, caused by a combination of high pressure, the hot weather and traffic pollution.

By yesterday as temperatures had dipped from 26C on Saturday to a cooler 22C yesterday, the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said that levels in Oxford were back down to being “low” at 59mcg.

It stated that unlike the start of the bank holiday weekend, pollution levels were unlikely to be noticed by asthmatics.

The hot weather sparked the smog alert as sunlight causes the formation of ozone by acting on nitrogen dioxide close to the ground and exhaust emissions from vehicles.

A second form of pollution, in the form of tiny particles known as PM10s, are also emitted by car exhausts and can cause headaches, burning eyes, coughing and an increased risk of heart attacks.

Both types of pollution can cause asthmatics to find breathing more difficult.

The UK will not face fines for the breach of the pollution target, as the EU has given Britain an extension, which means it has until June before it has to start meeting the standards across the country.

Comments(6)

EBTWO says...
9:18am Mon 25 Apr 11

Pollution in Oxford City Centre? Well since the only traffic are buses, really, then maybe we should start cutting buses in the daytime.

Or people should walk......

OldMoaner says...
10:45am Mon 25 Apr 11

The only traffic is buses? Have you been in the city centre recently?

This myth is persistent but untrue. Stand anywhere in the High and actually count the number of different types of vehicle in a one-hour period, then make such a statement.

You'll find that buses make up between 1 in 5 and 1 in 4 of the vehicles in the High during that time, which means that most traffic is NOT buses.

Even those buses that are there, the majority have systems installed to reduce particulates and NOx emissions, or are hybrids, with more due to arrive soon, I understand.

CLLR KEN TIWARI says...
3:25pm Mon 25 Apr 11

May I congratulate our bus operator's
for Oxford City and JR, service is the-Best, thank you........


Cllr Ken Tiwari (parish R&S, Oxfordshire

Mr Peter Mcvay says...
8:31pm Mon 25 Apr 11

The hot weather sparked the smog alert as sunlight causes the formation of ozone by acting on nitrogen dioxide close to the ground..............
....

Well if it was caused by ozone, why are we going to all this trouble to save it. Burn more greenfly thingys I say and save us from the smog.

newcy says...
12:33pm Tue 26 Apr 11

My observations match those of Old Moaners - most of the traffic I see in the city centre is deliveries and service vehicles, closely followed by private cars (presumably ignorant of pedestrianisation) -and some cross-over here between shop owners bringing in stock in their own cars-, I'd say of the remaining 2 in 5 these are local authority-contracted service vehicles (of which the little street-cleansing vans are not petrol/diesel fuelled), taxis and buses.

The city centre seems noticably worst in mid-Autumn when there's a good deal of low cloud, and smog is clearly apparent -my lungs give me absolute hell at these times.

newcy says...
12:36pm Tue 26 Apr 11

Having worked in locations where I've had to cross the city centre on foot in the past, the startling thing is the amount of grime in the air. I used to get in to work and wash my face immediately - the water was coming off dark-grey to black -despite a good shower and scrub before leaving the house each morning.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree