Oxford RSS Feed


Children WILL be fined for littering in Oxford


LITTER louts as young as 10 can now be fined £80 if they drop rubbish in an Oxford street or park – and their parents could end up in court.

Oxford City Council’s executive board has sanctioned new powers to take the tough line with youngsters as part of its ongoing war on litter.

But opponents said they are horrified by the measures.

John Tanner, the council's executive member for a cleaner Oxford, said: “At the moment anybody under 18 cannot receive an on-the-spot fine, but we know from experience some of the biggest litter droppers are under 18.

“This is another piece in the jigsaw of getting our streets clean. It is not heavy handed.

“If they don’t pay the parents will be taken to court.”

The new powers allow council enforcement teams to warn children caught littering and ask them to pick up the rubbish they have dropped.

If the youngster refuses and shows no remorse then their details will be passed to Thames Valley Police.

The police could then write to parents, or in persistent cases issue a £80 fine.

But Mr Tanner said the policy would not be used against foreign language students, who had blighted city parks with litter during late night parties, because they would have returned home before a fine could be enforced.

He added: “If they see our young people being dealt with by enforcement officers that will have an effect.”

Council chief executive Peter Sloman said: “Officers involved really believe having this will be another weapon in their armoury.”

The council began a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to litter in November 2009 and enforcement officers have issued 449 fines to date, raising £26,485.

But a number of fines, issued as part of the council’s ‘Cleaner, Greener’ campaign, were torn up after it was discovered they had been given to children.

The Liberal Democrat leader on the council, Stephen Brown, said he was “horrified” by the scheme.

He added: “You are criminalising 10-year-olds. What if a child does not have a pro-active parent or guardian?”

The experience of officers on the Leys was one of the factors in adopting the powers. Police said the youngest person to be handed a fixed penalty notice in Oxford, for a traffic offence on Botley Road in May, was aged 16.

Comments(9)

GTS kiddy says...
5:39pm Sat 4 Sep 10

the policy would not be used against foreign language students, who had blighted city parks with litter during late night parties, because they would have returned home before a fine could be enforced. what a load of rubbish, if we were in a foreign country we would be either made to pick it up or get an on the spot fine or probably deported, and children from here wont pick it up because they will just say 'if they dont have to we dont' and I cant say I blame them. It should be the same rule for everybody or none at all.

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon says...
7:35pm Sat 4 Sep 10

Surely it is illegal for the council to introduce a racist law. This needs challenging.

Man on the Green says...
9:15am Sun 5 Sep 10

As put by Mr Tanner, this policy is in very clear breach of Article 18 TEU (the EU treaty - which has binding force in the member states), and the responsible officer or member could well find themselves in the dock. One must question too whether the council's enforcement officers apply (or not) their litter rules in the same way to adult non-UK residents. If so, any fines or penalties imposed could be easily opposed on the grounds of prima facie discrimination, and recent changes now give even Magistrates' Courts the power to refer a such matters to the Court of Justice.

Mr Tanner needs to seek urgent legal advice from competent counsel, if City taxpayers are not to be saddled with huge costs and he himself found to have breached Treaty obligations.

Common Sense Approach says...
9:34am Sun 5 Sep 10

But Mr Tanner said the policy would not be used against foreign language students, WHO HAD blighted city parks with litter during late night parties, because they would have returned home before a fine could be enforced.

I think he is trying to say it won't be used against those that caused litter THIS year as they will have gone home - but it could be used in the future

Paper rounds must be paying a lot more than in my day, if kids can afford £80 fines!!!

GTS kiddy says...
12:22pm Sun 5 Sep 10

Common Sense Approach wrote:
But Mr Tanner said the policy would not be used against foreign language students, WHO HAD blighted city parks with litter during late night parties, because they would have returned home before a fine could be enforced. I think he is trying to say it won't be used against those that caused litter THIS year as they will have gone home - but it could be used in the future Paper rounds must be paying a lot more than in my day, if kids can afford £80 fines!!!
but isnt that obvious they cannot be fined because the scheme hasnt started yet!! but why are these students having these late night parties in carparks in the first place?? Maybe if that was stopped the litter wouldnt be there!!!

Berty says...
5:32pm Sun 5 Sep 10

If foreign students are being excluded I am more than happy to contact Liberty, Amnesty and the Europen Courts to insist this biased and ridiculous law is reversed. It has become apparent over the years that they don't learn how to queue, behave on a bus or give way to people on the pavement as they walk four abreast, so I doubt very much that they will learn about littering by observation. What a moron.

Inn0cence says...
9:06pm Sun 5 Sep 10

But Mr Tanner said the policy would not be used against foreign language students, who had blighted city parks with litter during late night parties, because they would have returned home before a fine could be enforced.

And the government want to know why we are racist? Nobody likes favouritism yet its so frequently evident in all those in power do. Grrr.

mhr54@msn.com says...
11:01pm Sun 5 Sep 10

They should be fined for cycling on pavements too.

Oxwall says...
9:20am Mon 6 Sep 10

Why doesn't the 'zero tolerance' apply to the University either? How many times have the pavements been 'littered' with their eggs,flour, syrup,confetti etc etc when they are celebrating their finals? Or should the elite be forgiven for their misdemeanors as it is a custom to throw these things about the city?


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses