Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
7:46pm Tuesday 9th February 2010 in
OPPOSITION councillors branded Oxfordshire County Council’s 2010-11 budget “destructive”, as cuts of more than £100m were voted through at County Hall today.
The council’s ruling Conservative group approved proposals to make £103.8m of savings over the next five years, although £72m of that figure will be ploughed back into other services.
Up to 500 jobs will be shed over the five year period, but the Tories insisted they had done their best for the county by ring-fencing money for key services.
They voted through the lowest council tax increase in more than a decade, which means Oxfordshire householders will only face a rise of 2.75 per cent in the county council’s share of the bill from April.
The authority has also pledged to freeze the tax for the following two years, in line with the Conservatives’ election platform.
The tax increase means an average Band D household will pay £1,161.71 for the council’s share of the tax bill, an increase of £31.09 a year, or £2.59 a month, from 2009-10 bills.
Other moves approved at yesterday’s full council meeting included increasing parking permit fees in Oxford by £10, requiring outdoor education centres to be self-financing and freezing councillors’ allowances.
Savings will also be made in the council’s youth service and buildings maintenance budgets.
Mark Fysh, the council’s branch secretary of the union Unison, said it was considering balloting members for strike action next year if plans to remove £1m from the council’s home care support budget in 2011 go ahead, although the council has insisted front-line services would not be affected.
Some opposition councillors mocked the Conservative administration’s mantra of “low tax, real choice and value for money”.
Green group leader Larry Sanders said: “This is a very destructive budget, it’s bad for the economy of the county.
“You can’t take 500 jobs out of the council and all the money that brings in for people without having a negative effect.”
Oxford Labour councillor John Tanner said: “This budget has no choice, higher taxes and low value for money.”
Carterton South West Conservative councillor Pete Handley said: “We’re going to make almost £105m in savings. Can we say hand on heart that’s not going to affect anybody? I support this budget with a heavy heart.”
Council leader Keith Mitchell said: “We set this budget in the context of a national position where the country is £800bn in debt and the Government is deciding to delay a comprehensive spending review, increasing the uncertainty over what we face.
“Whatever Government we have after the next election will be cutting public spending.
“We need to set a budget that recognises the inevitability of that public spending squeeze.”
Comments(12)
HughdeGree
says...
11:34pm Tue 9 Feb 10
HughdeGree
says...
11:38pm Tue 9 Feb 10
Fat boy
says...
7:43am Wed 10 Feb 10
camden
says...
9:02am Wed 10 Feb 10
Fat boy wrote:Though I agree public sector pension's do seem to be unaffected there is also the major problem of too many not contributing a penny towards the upkeep of public services. There are too many scroungers sponging of the state. Get tough if they are not in genuine need stop paying them benefits force them back to work.
Any mention of them cutting their pension costs in all this - I thought not. Council tax goes up EVERY year, services get cut EVERY year. Copper-bottomed gold plated pensions and early retirement for council workers continue totally unaffected. I think it's time to take to the streets comrades
Gareth Keenan
says...
9:48am Wed 10 Feb 10
Witney Mariner
says...
11:53am Wed 10 Feb 10
Any One
says...
1:31pm Wed 10 Feb 10
Ph1l1p
says...
1:36pm Wed 10 Feb 10
GaryOxford
says...
3:33pm Wed 10 Feb 10
Ph1l1p wrote:The trouble is there isn't actually a legally recognised way of monitoring speed restrictions under 30mph. And most equipment used to catch speeding motorists isn't calibrated for lower speeds.
They still had the money for the nutty 20 mph speed limit in Oxford and plan one for Abingdon even though the police say they will do nothing for road safety. Perhaps they are looking for more revenue from their many speed cameras.
Pter mcvey
says...
5:52pm Wed 10 Feb 10
Ph1l1p wrote:Don't forget all the money they want to waste on new speed limit signs in Oxon
They still had the money for the nutty 20 mph speed limit in Oxford and plan one for Abingdon even though the police say they will do nothing for road safety. Perhaps they are looking for more revenue from their many speed cameras.
Megs
says...
8:32pm Wed 10 Feb 10
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find jobs in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Make a date in Oxfordshire and find friendship
Search Now »
Find homes in Oxford, Banbury and Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Cars for sale in and around Oxfordshire
Search Now »
Headington-Heathcliff says...
10:21pm Tue 9 Feb 10