Oxford RSS Feed


Oxfordshire County Council votes through 'destructive' cuts & 500 jobs cull


OPPOSITION councillors branded Oxfordshire County Council’s 2010-11 budget “destructive”, as cuts of more than £100m were voted through at County Hall today.

The council’s ruling Conservative group approved proposals to make £103.8m of savings over the next five years, although £72m of that figure will be ploughed back into other services.

Up to 500 jobs will be shed over the five year period, but the Tories insisted they had done their best for the county by ring-fencing money for key services.

They voted through the lowest council tax increase in more than a decade, which means Oxfordshire householders will only face a rise of 2.75 per cent in the county council’s share of the bill from April.

The authority has also pledged to freeze the tax for the following two years, in line with the Conservatives’ election platform.

The tax increase means an average Band D household will pay £1,161.71 for the council’s share of the tax bill, an increase of £31.09 a year, or £2.59 a month, from 2009-10 bills.

Other moves approved at yesterday’s full council meeting included increasing parking permit fees in Oxford by £10, requiring outdoor education centres to be self-financing and freezing councillors’ allowances.

Savings will also be made in the council’s youth service and buildings maintenance budgets.

Mark Fysh, the council’s branch secretary of the union Unison, said it was considering balloting members for strike action next year if plans to remove £1m from the council’s home care support budget in 2011 go ahead, although the council has insisted front-line services would not be affected.

Some opposition councillors mocked the Conservative administration’s mantra of “low tax, real choice and value for money”.

Green group leader Larry Sanders said: “This is a very destructive budget, it’s bad for the economy of the county.

“You can’t take 500 jobs out of the council and all the money that brings in for people without having a negative effect.”

Oxford Labour councillor John Tanner said: “This budget has no choice, higher taxes and low value for money.”

Carterton South West Conservative councillor Pete Handley said: “We’re going to make almost £105m in savings. Can we say hand on heart that’s not going to affect anybody? I support this budget with a heavy heart.”

Council leader Keith Mitchell said: “We set this budget in the context of a national position where the country is £800bn in debt and the Government is deciding to delay a comprehensive spending review, increasing the uncertainty over what we face.

“Whatever Government we have after the next election will be cutting public spending.

“We need to set a budget that recognises the inevitability of that public spending squeeze.”

Comments(12)

Headington-Heathcliff says...
10:21pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Can you cut my council tax by 2.75%? I can't afford to pay for public sector pensions far better than anything I'm likely to get (if I live that long).

HughdeGree says...
11:34pm Tue 9 Feb 10

If they are seeking to save money and protect front line services, then why have back office staff recently been recruited and reorganised to higher paying posts in areas such as Property and Corporate Core?

HughdeGree says...
11:38pm Tue 9 Feb 10

Why don't they save by getting rid of duplicate managers when most of the work is done by external organisations? Managers, managing managers, who manage external managers who manage the one person who actually does the work?

How about getting rid of expensive posts such as the £75,000 per year spin doctor who works for Keith Mitchel or the work the Council does for free for non elected posts such as the Lord Lieutenant, instead of cutting home care services?

Fat boy says...
7:43am Wed 10 Feb 10

Any mention of them cutting their pension costs in all this - I thought not.
Council tax goes up EVERY year, services get cut EVERY year. Copper-bottomed gold plated pensions and early retirement for council workers continue totally unaffected.
I think it's time to take to the streets comrades

camden says...
9:02am Wed 10 Feb 10

Fat boy wrote:
Any mention of them cutting their pension costs in all this - I thought not. Council tax goes up EVERY year, services get cut EVERY year. Copper-bottomed gold plated pensions and early retirement for council workers continue totally unaffected. I think it's time to take to the streets comrades
Though I agree public sector pension's do seem to be unaffected there is also the major problem of too many not contributing a penny towards the upkeep of public services. There are too many scroungers sponging of the state. Get tough if they are not in genuine need stop paying them benefits force them back to work.

Gareth Keenan says...
9:48am Wed 10 Feb 10

Anybody seen the news in the last two years or so? There's a worldwide economic crisis, in case you hadn't noticed, so it seems to make sense to react to the situation accordingly.

Sure, nobody likes losing things, but hey, if we were in a situation where things weren't planned for then I'm sure we'd be in a far worse state.

It's time to wake up and smell the Nescafe folks. One of the reasons for the global financial mess is people taking on mortgages etc that they simply can't afford, or living on an array of credit cards.

If people take a minute to look at themselves rather than pointing the finger then I think a crisper sense of perspective might be gained.

Witney Mariner says...
11:53am Wed 10 Feb 10

Maybe some of these jobs could have been saved if some Wunderkind at Oxfordshire County Council hadn't decided to erect those new electronic traffic information signs around Oxford. How much did these cost? I've never seen any useful info on them. Has anyone else? Thanks for telling me to "Watch out for Bikes" and "It's darker in winter". Cretins.

Any One says...
1:31pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Oh Great, so now I have to pay £50 to park my car somewhere near to where I live instead of £40. I.m not great at percentages but is that not somewhat excessive.

Can the council not start making money from all those 'tradesman' that work in the city centre /jericho everyday and get free parking.
And start charging cyclists everytime they jump a red light in the same way motorists are, not just on special awareness days.
How about fining the students who leave piles and piles of rubbish outside their properties.

I.d like this one please....start fining landlords and letting agents who do not maintain their properties or follow the rulkes that they know they should be doing. How about spot checks on properties let through agents.

How about fining the colleges each time the council or police have to remove abandoned bikes that are identifed as college bikes. An abandoned bike form Worcester college was left on Walton St, secured to a bus stop for months.

There's plenty of ways the council could be making money...............
they're quite happy to tke it from the local permanent residents

Ph1l1p says...
1:36pm Wed 10 Feb 10

They still had the money for the nutty 20 mph speed limit in Oxford and plan one for Abingdon even though the police say they will do nothing for road safety. Perhaps they are looking for more revenue from their many speed cameras.

GaryOxford says...
3:33pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Ph1l1p wrote:
They still had the money for the nutty 20 mph speed limit in Oxford and plan one for Abingdon even though the police say they will do nothing for road safety. Perhaps they are looking for more revenue from their many speed cameras.
The trouble is there isn't actually a legally recognised way of monitoring speed restrictions under 30mph. And most equipment used to catch speeding motorists isn't calibrated for lower speeds.
So even if the council did collect the revenue from people breaking the speed limit they wouldn't be able get any more money from the 20mph limits.

Pter mcvey says...
5:52pm Wed 10 Feb 10

Ph1l1p wrote:
They still had the money for the nutty 20 mph speed limit in Oxford and plan one for Abingdon even though the police say they will do nothing for road safety. Perhaps they are looking for more revenue from their many speed cameras.
Don't forget all the money they want to waste on new speed limit signs in Oxon

Megs says...
8:32pm Wed 10 Feb 10

David Cameron is on record as admiring the way Keith Mitchell, their leader, has managed OCC's finances. Is this good or bad?


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses