Network Rail admits 'considerable problems' with £1bn rail electrification project

Oxford Mail: Network Rail admits 'considerable problems' with £1bn rail electrification project Network Rail admits 'considerable problems' with £1bn rail electrification project

NETWORK Rail has admitted to Wantage MP Ed Vaizey it has had “considerable problems” with its £1bn electrification project so far.

Mr Vaizey, who previously branded the company “incompetent and insensitive”, said directors told him they would work “much harder” to minimise the inevitable disruption the project would cause.

It comes after the rail infrastructure company announced last month that it would have to close Fulscot Bridge in South Moreton, near Didcot, for double the six months already suffered by residents. It has now submitted an application to South Oxfordshire District Council to raise the bridge, after discovering “more work was needed”.

The company is working on electrifying the Great Western Mainline for improved and faster services.

After meeting with directors, Mr Vaizey said: “They have acknowledged that there have been considerable problems in the work done on bridges so far, and that they needed to make considerable improvements to their planning and the way they work with local councils and local communities. I have already seen some evidence of measures being put in place to do so...

“I was also heartened to hear that Network Rail will work much harder with their contractors and the county council to minimise, as far as possible, the inevitable disruption that this work will cause.”

Network Rail spokeswoman Anne-Marie Batson said: “We certainly acknowledged to Mr Vaizey that there have been considerable challenges on the bridge projects and this included Fulscot Bridge.

“We are currently installing new embankments but, unfortunately, more work is needed to bring the road back into line with the bridge and reinforce the arch supports at the sides.

“We will continue working closely with Mr Vaizey’s office, the local authorities, parish and town councils and the community throughout the project to keep everyone informed.”

Comments (6)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:08am Wed 23 Apr 14

Major Rhode-Werks says...

So shall we call it a £2bn project now then?
So shall we call it a £2bn project now then? Major Rhode-Werks
  • Score: 6

8:40am Wed 23 Apr 14

downsview says...

Fills one with confidence - not - when they close the bridges at Steventon and esp at Grove Road
Fills one with confidence - not - when they close the bridges at Steventon and esp at Grove Road downsview
  • Score: 4

9:27am Wed 23 Apr 14

Gunslinger says...

Incompetent, yes.

As network operator, NR should have been fully aware of the condition and nature of these structures. Electrification of the Great Western main line has been on the cards for decades.
Incompetent, yes. As network operator, NR should have been fully aware of the condition and nature of these structures. Electrification of the Great Western main line has been on the cards for decades. Gunslinger
  • Score: -6

1:08pm Wed 23 Apr 14

Andrew:Oxford says...

"Mr Vaizey’s office, the local authorities, parish and town councils and the community"

So essentially four organisations involved plus the "community" - no wonder things take so long in this country. Everyone is "involved" but nobody takes leadership.

I'd suggest building all new wider bridges - but that would no doubt result in "fears" of development within many villages.
"Mr Vaizey’s office, the local authorities, parish and town councils and the community" So essentially four organisations involved plus the "community" - no wonder things take so long in this country. Everyone is "involved" but nobody takes leadership. I'd suggest building all new wider bridges - but that would no doubt result in "fears" of development within many villages. Andrew:Oxford
  • Score: -9

1:21pm Wed 23 Apr 14

yabbadabbadoo256 says...

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
"Mr Vaizey’s office, the local authorities, parish and town councils and the community"

So essentially four organisations involved plus the "community" - no wonder things take so long in this country. Everyone is "involved" but nobody takes leadership.

I'd suggest building all new wider bridges - but that would no doubt result in "fears" of development within many villages.
yes, and cue the rush to "List" all the old bridges as "assets of community value" *yawns*
[quote][p][bold]Andrew:Oxford[/bold] wrote: "Mr Vaizey’s office, the local authorities, parish and town councils and the community" So essentially four organisations involved plus the "community" - no wonder things take so long in this country. Everyone is "involved" but nobody takes leadership. I'd suggest building all new wider bridges - but that would no doubt result in "fears" of development within many villages.[/p][/quote]yes, and cue the rush to "List" all the old bridges as "assets of community value" *yawns* yabbadabbadoo256
  • Score: 12

10:28pm Wed 23 Apr 14

John Smith II says...

What does 'considerable challenges' mean? - does it mean that mistakes have been made and the work is having to be re-done to correct these errors?
What does 'considerable challenges' mean? - does it mean that mistakes have been made and the work is having to be re-done to correct these errors? John Smith II
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree