I was encouraged to see the reply from Professors Millar and Savill to David Martin's attack on animal experimentation (Letters, November 13). I am absolutely certain that no-one wishes to see needless experimentation on any animal and perhaps even less so, if that is possible, on primates.
However, there are several things that Mr Martin and your readers should consider. First, that this research is designed to improve the lot of people suffering from appalling diseases with, as yet, unmet medical need. He must also be aware that research is conducted on computer models and cell and tissue structures where possible. The people who conduct this research are so often vilified in the media, yet their goal is our increased wellbeing.
The other key issue for us that we must also consider and be proud of is that Scottish universities were at the heart of the spread and development of scientifically-based medical education and research during the Scottish Enlightenment. Make no mistake, our forebears' desire to improve the lot of many across the globe was indirectly responsible for saving and improving the lives of many millions.
It would be a folly for us to allow European politicians to damage our heritage and one of the few shining lights left in what his ex-colleague, Tony Blair, called "the knowledge-based economy". It is almost unbelievable that as we move into harsher economic times that we would allow Mr Martin's short-sightedness to damage one of the few real Scottish jewels and just claimant to be a sector with competitive advantage on the global stage. I urge all your readers to exercise their franchise accordingly in the European elections next year.
Jim Swift BA MSc MIHM, Conservative councillor, Newton Mearns South, East Renfrewshire Council.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article