Letters RSS Feed


Questions to answer over academies plan

IN YOUR report on Oxfordshire primary schools becoming academies (Oxford Mail, February 7), county councillor Melinda Tilley talks of a “bright new future” for Oxfordshire education.

However, the picture of what is going on is muddy with questions.

Firstly, nine of the 10 schools listed were Ofsted-assessed as satisfactory, making satisfactory progress or good. Presumably, those are all not good enough, though. Why not?

Secondly, there’s an assumption by the Government that sponsors – businesses, charities, religious organisations – could improve the schools in matters of literacy, etc, when compared with traditional providers. On what evidence?

Admittedly, there’s also a reference to more successful schools being sponsors. But doesn’t that mean doing two jobs in the time of, or for the price of one? Or more money?

So, thirdly, who is really driving this?

Mrs Tilley says: “What we want is a local solution – we don’t really want to be told we have to do it by the Government”.

But elsewhere in the article we are told Michael Gove wants the transformation to academies and Mrs Tilley says: “Local authorities have less power in law to affect performance in schools than ever before…”

So, the overall answer is that academies mean the Government taking powers off local authorities and then handing them to unelected sponsors.

That’s hardly ‘local’ and I can’t see how it guarantees stability, let alone improvement for the children in the long term.

What we do know is there will be start-up cash injections for the new establishments, which seems to be the real incentive.

But if these bright new schools set their own admission requirements, does that mean excluding the kids whose low attainment meant the figures weren’t so good? What will happen to them?

Is the county council really behind all this, or just putting up with orders from above?

JOEL KAYE, Purcell Road, Oxford

Comments(1)

the wizard says...
1:26am Fri 17 Feb 12

You can do what you want with schools, change their names, budgets and everything else, but it all boils down to one thing, the pupil. If said child doesn't want to learn it won't. If he/she is bright and wants to get on they will, on matter what their back ground, upbringing etc. Perhaps if stricter codes of discipline were introduced, and more parents challenged to bring about a general raising of the bar all this expense when the country has no money could be avoided, but then again "call me Dave" would just Grammar Schools to come back no doubt, so he is calling them something else instead. Its a con by the Cons, and it is so easy to see through its almost unbelievable.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree