Writing as an early-taking, resit-improved student of English language O-Level, I sympathise with certain schools’ reluctance to publish anything other than final grades achieved by young people who may have had two or more bites at the maths and English cherries in their GCSE exams.
Two key points may be borne in mind: exam results ‘belong to’ the young person who has earned them and, consequently, they should stand as a mark of that person’s final achievement in any particular subject; and schools need a common system of comparison if meaningful conclusions are to be drawn about which are the ‘better’ schools, and which ‘worse’. This summer’s debate exposes the tensions between these two claims.
With school or training now continuing until 18, and with an expectation that maths and English should continue supported through these years for students yet to reach their full potential, then the notion of continuing improvement is built in, and any artificial horizon at 16 is just that – an arbitrary staging post erected outwith the individual interests of each of the young people concerned.
In healthcare, if drinking plenty of barley water fails, then a course of antibiotics might be prescribed; in law, if a case seems to have been decided contrarily, then an appeal may be launched.
In each case, the profession operates in a framework allowing repeat and improving interventions, to the benefit of the patient or appellant.
If schools don’t like their common system or framework, let them negotiate a better one. Doctors and lawyers appear less buffeted than headteachers.
James Dasaolu might never run as fast as Usain Bolt, but we don’t want to discourage him from trying. We keep a common system of comparison (a good watch and 100m), and let them go again and again.
Peter Martin, Church Close, Bampton
- Do you want alerts delivered straight to your phone via our WhatsApp service? Text NEWS or SPORT or NEWS AND SPORT, depending on which services you want, and your full name to 07767 417704. Save our number into your phone's contacts as Oxford Mail WhatsApp and ensure you have WhatsApp installed.
Send your Letter to the Editor: What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter for publication here
11:20am Monday 28th July 2014
What do you think? We welcome letters from our readers on a wide variety of subjects and you can send us a letter through the blue headline above.
3:07pm Tuesday 31st March 2015
Cycling-wise, my family’s move from East Oxford to Charlbury couldn’t have been smarter...
3:04pm Tuesday 31st March 2015
Regarding the housing development protests in Benson, I would like to put forward my view on the situation...
3:03pm Tuesday 31st March 2015
All those officers involved in smashing this £24m drugs ring (Mail, March 25) are to be highly commended for their hard work and the sentences passed must have given extreme satisfaction for a job well done...
3:02pm Tuesday 31st March 2015
Essential services, especially in hospitals, should not have to depend on temporary staff (March 16).
3:00pm Tuesday 31st March 2015
In these days of austerity where there are cuts here, there and everywhere, how can we afford £50bn to spend on a HS2 rail link between London and the Midlands?