Editorial Comment RSS Feed


Talks stall on plans for Oxford shopping centre

The proposed centre in St Aldate's The proposed centre in St Aldate's

PLANS for a £22m shopping complex in the heart of Oxford are under threat following the collapse of talks with the city council, it emerged last night.

Global equity firm Carlyle Group submitted ambitious plans to create a new open-air shopping centre running from the St Aldate’s Tavern archway to Queen Street, near the Marks & Spencer store.

The company said it was ready to regenerate a neglected part of Oxford’s historic city centre, creating new shops, offices, student accommodation and jobs.

But a question mark hangs over the whole scheme because agreement cannot be reached with the council over how much Carlyle should pay into Town Hall coffers under a planning agreement.

The so called Section 106 agreements are legally binding and oblige landowners and developers to contribute to council works and services.

But business leaders warned that failure to reach agreement could see the city lose a major opportunity to redevelop the shabby site behind St Aldate’s.

Carlyle submitted a planning application in 2008, with plans for nine new shops, 17,000 sq ft of office space and accommodation for up to 96 students. But nearly two years on, the application has still not been considered.

A Town Hall spokesman said: “The scheme at St Aldate’s and Queen Street would require a significant Section 106 contribution from the applicant. We have been unable to negotiate with the applicant a level of contribution that we feel we would be able to recommend to our members.”

“Part of the section 106 money would be spent on infrastructure in the city’s West End quarter, for example improvements to Frideswide Square.”

Mark Harris, head of UK asset management for Carlyle, said: “We are very disappointed we have not been able to come to an agreement with the council.

“We want to create a purpose-built, open-air shopping centre, which would vastly improve the shopping experience for both local consumers and visitors, create jobs and regenerate an area which is in need of investment.”

But he added: “Despite the delays, we are still completely committed to the scheme. We have the funding in place to take this forward and hope to receive a positive response from the planning committee.”

David Doughty, chief executive of the Oxfordshire Enterprise Partnership, said: “When it comes to retail, Oxford is punching well below its weight. The city should be welcoming anything that brings improvement to Oxford’s retail offering. We should encourage schemes like this before companies lose interest and go somewhere else.”

City councillor for the Carfax Ward,Tony Brett, said: “It is always a shame to see an important opportunity missed. At the same time the council cannot give things away.”

news@oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(13)

RJOxford says...
12:23pm Thu 29 Jul 10

And you honestly believe this will happen?

Jimmer says...
12:32pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Why aren't the council biting off the hands of these people?? Shopping in Oxford is dire, offers very little other than the covered market. Maybe the plans dont contain enough coffee shops/mobile phone shops.

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon says...
1:35pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Jimmer wrote:
Why aren't the council biting off the hands of these people?? Shopping in Oxford is dire, offers very little other than the covered market. Maybe the plans dont contain enough coffee shops/mobile phone shops.
Because you would be the first to complain if the council gave this site away and lost a lot of money to the benefit of a private developer.

Jimmer says...
2:53pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon wrote:
Jimmer wrote: Why aren't the council biting off the hands of these people?? Shopping in Oxford is dire, offers very little other than the covered market. Maybe the plans dont contain enough coffee shops/mobile phone shops.
Because you would be the first to complain if the council gave this site away and lost a lot of money to the benefit of a private developer.
I wouldn't moan at all. What they lose from the sale of the site they would benfit in a potential influx of revenue from customers/tourists. Unless they fill it with coffee shops.

Belllssss says...
3:08pm Thu 29 Jul 10

What they should do is have something built on the other side of town. There are already 2 shopping centres so close to each other, with one in talks of extra development/expansio
n. If they're going to build something similar so close they might aswell link the whole thing up and turn it in to one big place. It'd be better off on the Debenhams end of Cornmarket Street, giving shoppers more excuse to walk through town and therefore visit other shops/food places, rather than sticking to the one area.

newcy says...
3:16pm Thu 29 Jul 10

I assume the underwritten beneficiaries of the S106 payments will be made available in full detail for the public - better not be wanting the extra cash for Mr Sadler to have another swimming ppol/private jet/holiday in the Maldives etc. lol!

newcy says...
3:19pm Thu 29 Jul 10

After the shambolic and awful behaviour of the City Council so far, is anyone surprised that its motivation is solely greed? If they needed more money to invest in the city why did they extract it falsely from the honest tax-payer to give fat-cats huge pay-rises, rather than invest it where it was needed?

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon says...
6:12pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Jimmer wrote:
Apu Nahasapeemapetilon wrote:
Jimmer wrote: Why aren't the council biting off the hands of these people?? Shopping in Oxford is dire, offers very little other than the covered market. Maybe the plans dont contain enough coffee shops/mobile phone shops.
Because you would be the first to complain if the council gave this site away and lost a lot of money to the benefit of a private developer.
I wouldn't moan at all. What they lose from the sale of the site they would benfit in a potential influx of revenue from customers/tourists. Unless they fill it with coffee shops.
If they gave away the Town Hall as well, then we could have shops either side of St Aldates. Just think about it, as decent retailers are hardly queuing up the fill all of the empty units that a scattered around the town centre now. It will be, Costa, Starbucks, Nero, and Republic every 10 yards. Oh shopping Heaven.

mandate says...
8:26pm Thu 29 Jul 10

Typical for every company willing to invest in any scheme in Oxford, they eventually lose interest because they can never get a straight answer from anybody in the council.
I am so tired of good ideas that benefit the city being stagnated by gutless and clueless council officials.
This results in developers going elsewhere and jobs and business opportunities are lost.
The people who decide in this city are in my eyes totally incompetent. They are completely out of their depth when it comes to decision making on future developements in Oxford.

simplicissimus says...
12:30am Fri 30 Jul 10

newcy wrote:
After the shambolic and awful behaviour of the City Council so far, is anyone surprised that its motivation is solely greed? If they needed more money to invest in the city why did they extract it falsely from the honest tax-payer to give fat-cats huge pay-rises, rather than invest it where it was needed?
Oxford City Kremlin - like Labour while in power nationally - is a form of government AGAINST the People.
Look at the loss of citizens' facilities in Northway (£442k's worth demolished! - against the wishes of the late Ms Christian, and Messrs Altaf-Khan and Rundle. Appointed officers seem to run rings around elected members!)

Similar with Grantham House in Jericho. Move out the elderly, leave it sheeted up, gambling on higher stakes in the property casino.

In Rosehill, Beryl Mitchell died after her house was compulsorily purchased, and developers given land...

SOME people are making a tidy profit, eh!

Jimmer says...
10:10am Fri 30 Jul 10

mandate wrote:
Typical for every company willing to invest in any scheme in Oxford, they eventually lose interest because they can never get a straight answer from anybody in the council. I am so tired of good ideas that benefit the city being stagnated by gutless and clueless council officials. This results in developers going elsewhere and jobs and business opportunities are lost. The people who decide in this city are in my eyes totally incompetent. They are completely out of their depth when it comes to decision making on future developements in Oxford.
agreed!

john_crocker says...
10:22am Fri 30 Jul 10

Ive always felt this and/or the Westgate should be rebuilt and when it is rebuilt it should contain a new bus/coach terminus to remove the buses from the town centre and gloucester green.. Access to the town centre can then be made from the terminus through the new shopping complex Sadly this wont happen as it would require a bit of lateral thinking by our backward council.

Apu Nahasapeemapetilon says...
4:07am Sat 31 Jul 10

john_crocker wrote:
Ive always felt this and/or the Westgate should be rebuilt and when it is rebuilt it should contain a new bus/coach terminus to remove the buses from the town centre and gloucester green.. Access to the town centre can then be made from the terminus through the new shopping complex Sadly this wont happen as it would require a bit of lateral thinking by our backward council.
Err, I am confused. Remove the buses from the Town centre and place them in a new terminus either at Westgate, or St Aldates. If these 2 places are not in Oxford Town centre, where is?.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree