News RSS Feed


Council to pay £2 above minimum wage

Mark Latham cleaning the streets in Oxford Mark Latham cleaning the streets in Oxford

COMPANIES are being urged to raise wages for their lowest-paid staff, as Oxford City Council announced all its workers will be paid almost £2 above the minimum wage.

The council’s “living wage” is to be raised from £7.19 to £8.01 for all workers.

Councillors at the city executive board approved the proposals last week, which will cost the council an extra £8,700 a year.

Council deputy leader Ed Turner said: “We know Oxford is an increasingly expensive place to live in, so while the minimum wage is adequate in other parts of the country, it isn’t enough here.

“We want to improve this for all our staff, including the people who are working on contracts, like the people in our leisure centres.

“At the same time, we would like to set an example, promoting this living wage to other employers in the city.”

Mr Turner said the issue affected the way the council chose the suppliers and contractors it worked with.

He said: “In the same way we wouldn’t work with a timber company that was destroying the rainforest to supply wood, we couldn’t work with companies that weren’t paying their employees adequately.

“We want to encourage pay increases from the bottom up to remedy these problems.”

The national minimum wage rates are £6.08 for workers aged 21-plus and £4.98 for those aged between 18 and 20.

It is hoped it will benefit the lowest-paid groups of staff, including those employed in cleaning and refuse collection.

Oxford City Council’s Street Scene team leader Mark Latham said: “That wage is way over and above what you earn working for an agency, which is usually about £6.

“So I think for the work we do the wage is pretty good, when you consider it’s not a job which you need four years of training to do.”

But Laura Wilson from the Agnes Smith Advice Centre in Blackbird Leys said: “It’s a nice move but I’m not sure it will make much difference in the grand scheme of things.

“It probably won’t make a difference in the standard of living for someone who is already on a low income. The cost of living is rising at such a rate that people will still be struggling to pay their bills.”

Oxfordshire Chamber of Commerce president Nigel Wild said: “I applaud Oxford City Council for doing this.

“But I think businesses are having to cut their cloth accordingly at the moment and if they haven’t got the money, they can’t raise wages. Most people are taking the view that simply having a job is better than no job.”

Comments(6)

Milkbutnosugarplease says...
11:46am Mon 13 Feb 12

In the past I remember that the absenteeism of council workers was higher than for similar staff in the private sector. If they are paid at higher rates for less work, the council tax payer will be short-changed. If they work more for more money, good for them - so what are the current rates of absenteeism?

Dilligaf2010 says...
12:13pm Mon 13 Feb 12

"Councillors at the city executive board approved the proposals last week, which will cost the council an extra £8,700 a year."
If those at the top getting paid £50k+ took a pay cut, they could increase the pay of the workers even more.

chamox says...
1:34pm Mon 13 Feb 12

If the councillors raise the lowest paid by 11%... then they can award themselves a healthy pay rise still keeping a margin of 10X between the lowest and the highest paid in the council
Cynical or what not me

bagsie says...
1:59pm Mon 13 Feb 12

Oxford City Council is being very generous with my council tax which I struggle to pay. Will there magnanimity extend to decreasing council tax.

docs says...
5:43pm Mon 13 Feb 12

Those figures don't make sense.

Paying an extra 82p per hour gets you 10,609 hours for the stated £8,700. At 35 hours per week, that's 303 weeks, 45 working weeks per year, 6.7 person-years.

Surely the council employs more than 6.7 low-paid people?

Niko Bellic says...
1:32pm Thu 16 Feb 12

Docs, you're forgetting that not all of those getting a pay increase will be at the current minimum, some people will only see an increase of a few pence.

Far too often we see that all the benefits either go to the richest, who award themselves large bonuses and over the odds pay increases... and those who live off the state, who find themselves the beneficiaries of repeated increases in benefits linked to high inflation rates and soft touch policy. We never see those who work full time and are rewarded little recieve reward for what is undoubtably hard work and for that reason I welcome this change whole heartedly.

For the comment above complaining about their council tax, this increase is going to work out as about the contribution of about 7 or 8 council tax payers. Alternatively, for just ONE of the councils executives, it takes 100 years worth of council tax contributions, knowing that, do you still object to the minimum wage increase? Don't forget that public sector workers pay council tax too!

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree