News RSS Feed


City has to find site for homes


A PROPOSAL to build 4,000 homes south of Greater Leys is set to be killed off by changes to the planning process.

The controversial development, south of Grenoble Road has been in the pipeline since 2002.

But the new coalition Government plans to ditch the South East Plan – a blueprint for development until 2026 – and give power to local councils to decide where houses should be built.

Under the coalition’s planned Devolution and Localism Bill, the decision over the future of the scheme will lie with South Oxfordshire District Council (SODC), which opposes the scheme.

Last night, city council leader Bob Price said the situation was disappointing, but not unexpected.

He added he planned to discuss the matter with SODC but said if the last-ditch talks failed, the council could be forced to increase housing numbers at other development sites in the city including Oxpens, Barton West and at the Northern Gateway, near Pear Tree.

He added: “We have lots of infill sites but we are resistant to urban cramming and we do not want, under any circumstances, to encroach on the city’s green lungs.

“It creates a huge ongoing problem in developing the housing we have identified is needed by the city over the next 10 to 15 years.”

Oxford East MP Andrew Smith has put a question in the Commons to the new Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, asking about the “supply of housing in central Oxfordshire”.

Mr Smith said: “If, as reported, the coalition Government simply leaves the planning of housing to district councils, it puts Oxford in an impossible position. The city’s boundaries are so tight against the built-up area that there is wholly insufficient land within its control to plan and provide the housing the city desperately needs.”

Angie Paterson, SODC’s cabinet member for planning, said the council continued to support the protection of the Green Belt.

The Oxfordshire branch of the Campaign for the Protection of Rural England took High Court action over the plan last year.

CPRE campaign manager Helena Whall said: “This is the end of building in the Green Belt in the south of the city but may well open a can of worms north of Oxford as far as we’re concerned.”

cburatta@oxfordmail.co.uk What do you think about the city’s housing situation? Email news@oxfordmail.co.uk

Comments(14)

Lord Palmerstone says...
7:12am Thu 27 May 10

Allowing for realistic welfare reforms which remove the incentive for the feckless to reproduce, accepting the fact that non-feckless women want a career and have children later and in the hope that the government recognises the imperative that immigration be halted, projections as to the necessity of concreting over more of our food growing land may be too pessimistic. Not to mention that more concreting, when we are so much at the mercy of imported food, is downright insanity.

LittleBrother says...
8:24am Thu 27 May 10

Guess the sub-editor's a little sleepy this morning - "fine" site for homes? I hope they find a fine site.

camden says...
8:27am Thu 27 May 10

At last the powers to be have seen sense. This scheme along with others planning for thousands more houses in Didcot Wallingford etc etc are not the answer.

rowdy says...
12:25pm Thu 27 May 10

Stop giving single pregnant teenagers a flat would help - let the parents deal with it and not the tax payer...........!!!!
!!!!!!!!!

Joe Cooke says...
2:11pm Thu 27 May 10

Why is the land south of Grenoble Road Greenbelt? It's hardly an area of natural outstanding beauty! lack of affordable housing is a serious problem in Oxford, why should people have to move to Witney, Bicester, Didcot etc when they work in Oxford and are born here? an opertunate lost they should build houses there houses for the people of Oxford who can not afford the crazy prices in Oxford, and they should stop building more and more student flats on every spare bit of Land! Oxford for real Oxonians!

LadyPenelope says...
2:22pm Thu 27 May 10

Joe Cooke wrote:
Why is the land south of Grenoble Road Greenbelt? It's hardly an area of natural outstanding beauty! lack of affordable housing is a serious problem in Oxford, why should people have to move to Witney, Bicester, Didcot etc when they work in Oxford and are born here? an opertunate lost they should build houses there houses for the people of Oxford who can not afford the crazy prices in Oxford, and they should stop building more and more student flats on every spare bit of Land! Oxford for real Oxonians!
Greenbelt land doesn't have to be beautiful. We are an ISLAND and shouldn't just concrete over everything! If there is no room, live elsewhere! There is no law that states you HAVE to live in the town you grew up in.
Besides, the road structure wouldn't support the quantity of houses there, as it's already over its capacity. They'd have to build a car free zone with a railway line!

Snoop says...
4:19pm Thu 27 May 10

The fields beyond the main road are nice and support a great deal of wildlife. They also provide a very welcome diversion from living in a crowded and already over-developed estate. I wish they'd build a few more affordable homes around the villages for families who've been priced out of where they grew up.

Petrol Head says...
5:07pm Thu 27 May 10

LadyPenelope wrote:
Joe Cooke wrote: Why is the land south of Grenoble Road Greenbelt? It's hardly an area of natural outstanding beauty! lack of affordable housing is a serious problem in Oxford, why should people have to move to Witney, Bicester, Didcot etc when they work in Oxford and are born here? an opertunate lost they should build houses there houses for the people of Oxford who can not afford the crazy prices in Oxford, and they should stop building more and more student flats on every spare bit of Land! Oxford for real Oxonians!
Greenbelt land doesn't have to be beautiful. We are an ISLAND and shouldn't just concrete over everything! If there is no room, live elsewhere! There is no law that states you HAVE to live in the town you grew up in. Besides, the road structure wouldn't support the quantity of houses there, as it's already over its capacity. They'd have to build a car free zone with a railway line!
Pen, I would love to be able to live elsewhere as you suggest. But if I went to my chosen place (Thailand) and claimed asylum asking for a nice house and a few Baht to live on, I think the answer would contain 2 words one of which would be off.

Joe Cooke says...
6:33pm Thu 27 May 10

There is no law but you should have the right to live in the town where I was born lived a man ....etc as the song goes!

disco80 says...
7:22pm Thu 27 May 10

WHEN THATCHER SOLD OFF THE STOCK OF COUNCIL HOUSES THE MONEY RAISED SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTED IN BUILDING NEW HOMES. AS WE AS A COUNTRY ARE SO SHORT OF HOUSES WHY WAS IMMIGRATION ALLOWED TO SPIRAL OUT OF CONTROL?

Patrick in Devon says...
10:21pm Thu 27 May 10

Its more than high time the Green belt was updated. Its intention was to prevent unplanned urban sprawl and ribbon development. The Grenoble Rd proposal is neither of these. The alternatives, as Cllr Price says, are much worse for the people of Oxford.

It would be feasible to use the existing rail line, extended south, for transport. Perhaps extend it to the Baldons - suddenly their properties would increase in value and SODC (what an appropriate acronym!) would be getting a diferent message from the residents there.

the wizard says...
8:33am Fri 28 May 10

The fact of the matter is that eight years have been wasted here by planners, objecters, commitiees and all. What a disgrace at the rate/tax payers expense. There is a national shortage of affordable housing and Oxford is becoming a less and less attractive place to live. Why did the planners persist and why did they not move on and seek out alternatives as they are employed to do. Sounds to me like some fresh blood may be needed to shake things up, and a few back sides should be kicked as well. Eight years of dallying around is not acceptable.

Yours,

The Wizard

Petrol Head says...
2:43am Sun 30 May 10

disco80 wrote:
WHEN THATCHER SOLD OFF THE STOCK OF COUNCIL HOUSES THE MONEY RAISED SHOULD HAVE BEEN INVESTED IN BUILDING NEW HOMES. AS WE AS A COUNTRY ARE SO SHORT OF HOUSES WHY WAS IMMIGRATION ALLOWED TO SPIRAL OUT OF CONTROL?
Disco80. To make sure that the working class communities were killed off, the Milk Snatcher would not let councils use the money to build houses, that was the whole idea of selling them off, to turn labour voting council tennents, into Tory voting home owners.

Lord Palmerstone says...
7:03pm Sun 30 May 10

What are "working class communities"? We nearly all work.I think the fact is that welfarism was pumped up out of control in the belief that welfare dependents vote Labour. It may be true though I feel they are less likely to vote than us, but I'm sure Gordon's slashing away of our cash did buy you lot a few votes: expensive ones though.


Oxford City Council leader Bob Price begins the search for alternative housing sites Oxford City Council leader Bob Price begins the search for alternative housing sites

Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses