News RSS Feed


Wind farm ‘will not harm historic homes’


FOUR giant wind turbines planned for farmland in north Oxfordshire, would have no significant effect on historic buildings and monuments, an inquiry was told.

Today, Bolsterstone, the firm behind a proposed wind farm at Willowbank Farm, Fritwell, set out why it should be given planning permission for the development.

Last April the firm, which wants to generate electricity from four 125m-high turbines, was unanimously refused planning permission by councillors.

Dr Jonathan Edis, an expert in historic buildings, told a public inquiry at Cherwell District Council’s headquarters in Bodicote, Banbury, a wind farm was an acceptable view from 2,850 listed and historic buildings and monuments surrounding the site. He said: “In my view, the value described by English Heritage will be preserved around the proposed wind farm.”

Dr Edis, a former conservation officer, said turbines would be seen from places including Aynhoe Park and Rousham Park, near Lower Heyford, but would not be harmful to the listed sites.

Gwion Lewis, representing Cherwell District Council, said: “The impact on Aynhoe Park is a major issue for this inquiry.

“I’m expressing some concern you did not seek to revisit the site for the purposes of your assessment.”

Dr Edis said: “I do not agree.”

The inquiry continues.

Comments(7)

Lord Palmerston says...
7:43pm Thu 11 Mar 10

Dr Jonathan Edis, an expert in historic buildings, told a public inquiry at Cherwell District Council’s headquarters in Bodicote, Banbury, a wind farm was an acceptable view from 2,850 listed and historic buildings and monuments surrounding the site. He said: “In my view, the value described by English Heritage will be preserved around the proposed wind farm.”
Is Dr Jonathan Edis the person formerly known as Homer J Simpson?

Lord Palmerston says...
7:32am Fri 12 Mar 10

Well I hope that other readers are taking a more active part somewhere because , you know, whether or not our county is covered with hideous and useless steel contraptions is infinitely more important than the future of Oxford United. Or think the view you get of Didcot from 20 miles around-DOUBLED-and you'll get some idea of the impact of these monstrosities, paid for by you , through your electricity bills.

newcy says...
10:15am Fri 12 Mar 10

Personally, I find wind turbines more attractive and less offensive than Didcot power station, though must admit their overall efficiency compared to nuclear power for supplying a large area is not entirely clear. Pylons are also large and dominate the landscape, and can also emit noise - an irritating high-pitched whine. Sorry to cry 'Nimby' but that is my feeling - I wouldn't mind living near turbines - noise and size considered, and would feel slightly more ethically comfortable.

Andrew:Oxford says...
10:56am Fri 12 Mar 10

The turbines are quite beautiful, can't say the (barely noticable) noise has ever bothered me.

Lord Palmerston says...
1:52pm Fri 12 Mar 10

There we are then . Vox pop is in favour. What can I say? I don't live anywhere near them so they'll have no personal impact. Pylons are pretty ugly. They could be subterranean and I don't know why they're not, but at least they carry power where and when it's needed. The things we're talking about don't produce energy when it's wanted and are only built for a foolish subsidy. I don't dispute that there's a problem-fossil fuels will eventually run out, but anyone who thinks these things are any answer might be wise to lay off the whacky baccy.

wallingford1 says...
2:11pm Fri 12 Mar 10

Pylons carry the high voltage electricity and underground cables send the lower rated power to the sub-stations, s'why we have to have overhead cables, or else they'd melt.

People moan about the environment, they moan about the price of electricity and they moan when environmentally friendly, cheap and local power is handed to them on a plate. You can't win can you?

Lord Palmerston says...
2:47pm Fri 12 Mar 10

"when environmentally friendly, cheap and local power is handed to them on a plate. "
OK I didn't know that about pylons, that h.t. can't run in conduits, but what is it you're talking about above? If such a thing were on anyone's plate then who'd moan? It isn't , of course.Sadly, if we humans are damaging the environment it means we need less humans; ain't no other answer.


Most popular


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »

Local Businesses