Sikhs lose fight to keep their temple in Cherwell Drive (From Oxford Mail)
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
Sikhs lose fight to keep their temple in Cherwell Drive
5:25pm Wednesday 10th March 2010 in News By Emily Allen
OXFORD’S Sikh community must find a new place to worship after a planning inspector ruled they cannot use a Marston house as a temple.
In January last year, Oxford City Council refused an application for retrospective planning permission to change the use of 69 Cherwell Drive from a place of residence to a place of worship, following objections from neighbours.
The Sikh community’s appeal to the Government’s Planning Inspectorate was dismissed this week.
Now they have a year to stop using the semi-detached three bedroom home as a makeshift temple, and they must also demolish a single storey extension to the rear of the property, which is used as a congregation room, before the end of October.
They did not have planning consent for either.
Pargan Singh, 53, of Cherwell Drive, Marston, said the nearest Sikh temples were in Banbury, Swindon and Slough.
He said: “It’s a sad day for the Sikh community in Oxford.
“There should be some flexibility, the council should assist us in finding an alternative, we only want small help. We are not asking for a million-pound building.
“The effect on the whole community will be devastating.”
More than 100 people have joined a Facebook group to campaign against the decision, and Oxford University’s Sikh Society collected a 400-signature petition to save it.
Society president Priya Atwal, 19, said she was very disappointed by the decision.
She said: “Oxford’s homeless could be affected as free meals are offered by the temple.”
The Sikhs bought the property in February 2006 and added the extension four months later.
Last night, residents of the road welcomed the decision.
A 60-year-old woman, who asked not to be named, said: “I don’t object to them having a Sikh temple, but I do object to it being in a residential area. When they show up things get overcrowded.”
Another 68-year-old neighbour said: “On Sunday, cars are parked on the verges on both sides of the road. There is a health and safety problem with ambulance and fire engines going to the JR and Headington.
“We can’t sit in our garden in the summer because of the chanting.”
In his report, planning inspector Nigel Burrows said he had listened to the “impassioned pleas” in support of the temple, but cited traffic, road safety, noise and disturbance to residents among his concerns.
City council spokesman Louisa Dean said: “They have to stop using the building as a Sikh temple and community centre and they have 12 months from the date of the decision letter to do that.”
eallen@oxfordmail.co.uk
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (16)
11:12pm Wed 10 Mar 10
poppy721 says...
7:58am Thu 11 Mar 10
Sid Hunt says...
In the case of the Sikh temple, the works carried out did not have planning permission and are substandard. There is also a change of use required (again subject to planning permission) to alter from a residential dwelling to place of worship. This 'temple' is open 24 hours so creates a continual nuisance by way of people nosie and vehicular activity.
The statement “The effect on the whole community will be devastating.” made by Pargan Singh is nonsense - much of the local community will be relieved by the decision and they have a year to find an alternative which, to me, seems very generous.
8:46am Thu 11 Mar 10
Joe Cooke says...
11:27am Thu 11 Mar 10
Tom Daily says...
Just ask the residents of Bath Street in St. Clements how they feel now that the mosque has moved to Manzil way.
Joe lets remember it's irrelevant that the muslims have 3 mosques in Oxford, they raised the funds for them! Just like its irrelevant that the Christians have a church on almost every other street.
All Oxford citizens of all faiths are free to raise funds and buy/build there own place of worship in an appropriate location.
11:46am Thu 11 Mar 10
Joe Cooke says...
11:47am Thu 11 Mar 10
mirpuri says...
12:34pm Thu 11 Mar 10
Andrew:Oxford says...
5:29pm Thu 11 Mar 10
Sid Hunt says...
I wish you luck with your search but the onus is with the Sikhs to provide their own place to worship.
7:53pm Thu 11 Mar 10
Tom Daily says...
The IQRA school was in a same sort of fight as the Sikh community and they are busy fighting away to try and survive.
Which ever faith or school of thought a particular group may be part of, it's down to them as a group to come together and create a place for themselves.
10:16am Fri 12 Mar 10
bigsis17bicester says...
11:01am Fri 12 Mar 10
Joe Cooke says...
6:29pm Fri 12 Mar 10
Tom Daily says...
So I suppose today the price would seem quite cheap.
What I would hope is that wherever the Sikh community ends up, that they select a site which can accomodate future growth in members and traffic.
1:15am Sat 13 Mar 10
mirpuri says...
4:08pm Sat 13 Mar 10
Tom Daily says...
Who owns the old bus depot?, who is planning to buy it? where are funds coming from? if council coffers show some hard evidence as to how the money will be allocated!
The last area comittee meeting I went to, there was a 3/4 of an hour debate on whether the council could afford to buy the local allotment association a couple of hundred quid lawnmower! So where this alleged funds of in excess of a £million would come from will be interesting.
Put up or ..................
5:06pm Sat 13 Mar 10
mirpuri says...
7:16pm Mon 15 Mar 10
poppy721 says...
..