News RSS Feed


Forget zebras, we want to keep puffin

Nora Mackenzie with Hugh Jaeger of Bus Users UK Nora Mackenzie with Hugh Jaeger of Bus Users UK

A row has broken out over the planned removal of a puffin crossing outside County Hall in Oxford.

Oxfordshire County Council wants to replace it with a traditional zebra crossing further up the road on the corner of New Road and Castle Street.

Oxford City Access Forum member Nora Mackenzie wants to keep the crossing. Mrs Mackenzie said: “A zebra crossing poses difficulties for people with mobility problems and is even more frightening for people who are blind or partially sighted.”

The county council said the replacement crossing would be on a raised platform with a 20mph speed limit, and would prioritise the pedestrian over the car.

Transport planner Craig Rossington said it would mean pedestrians could cross without having to wait for lights.

Comments(12)

Andrew:Oxford says...
10:33pm Wed 10 Jun 09

Raised platforms are a little confusing...

Are cars crossing the pavement or are pedestrians crossing the road?

On the Cowley Road, there are lane markings indicating that cars exiting the side streets should give way to pedestrains, but for cars turning right into the side streets there is doubt over who has right of way on the raised section.

Either way the current pedestrian crossing is useful as it helps avoid the stinking underpass.

Andrew:Oxford says...
10:33pm Wed 10 Jun 09

Raised platforms are a little confusing...

Are cars crossing the pavement or are pedestrians crossing the road?

On the Cowley Road, there are lane markings indicating that cars exiting the side streets should give way to pedestrains, but for cars turning right into the side streets there is doubt over who has right of way on the raised section.

Either way the current pedestrian crossing is useful as it helps avoid the stinking underpass.

Andrew:Oxford says...
10:33pm Wed 10 Jun 09

Raised platforms are a little confusing...

Are cars crossing the pavement or are pedestrians crossing the road?

On the Cowley Road, there are lane markings indicating that cars exiting the side streets should give way to pedestrains, but for cars turning right into the side streets there is doubt over who has right of way on the raised section.

Either way the current pedestrian crossing is useful as it helps avoid the stinking underpass.

Old zimner says...
6:43am Thu 11 Jun 09

I think you are confused about markings giving way to peds. You are likely to get yourself run over. Cars have right of way.

Power says...
8:43am Thu 11 Jun 09

If you walk in front of cars that is a mistake. The car will win.

johnbanbury says...
9:37am Thu 11 Jun 09

Don't wish to be pedantic but you must always give way to pedestrians. Saying 'Yes officer, I ran the pedestrian over but I did have the right of way' most likely won't help. On the other hand, a pedestrian lying in hospital most likely won't get much consolation from thinking...'Well, I might have multiple injuries and I will be in traction for weeks but I was in the right'
The dangerous mix of pedestrians, bicycles, cars and lorrys usually works not just because of the rules but also because those rules are applied with a certain messure of good sense on everybodies part. Injuries usually happen when that good sense is absent. I do not believe that putting in more speed humps will help. If pedestrians have to wait for the lights to change, then they are just having to put up with the same inconvience that drivers have.

Old zimner says...
10:06am Thu 11 Jun 09

johnbanbury. 99% right sir. The only problem is, is that motorists stop at a red PED crossing light, but PEDS seem to think it means go. Regarding your "YES OFFICER" comment. Unless you deliberately hit the PED, if it is your right of way and the PED walks out in front of you and you can't stop, then no problem in the eyes of the law. It is an accident.

monachus says...
9:06pm Thu 11 Jun 09

Just noticed this story. Sorry to disappoint everyone, but Rule 206 of the Highway Code clearly states that cars turning at a road junction must give way to pedestrians who are crossing.

No one has the 'right of way' in the Highway Code

Hugh Jaeger says...
11:06pm Thu 11 Jun 09

The issue is not crossing the road at a junction, but crossing the road at a Zebra crossing (Highway Code rule 195). "Transport planner Craig Rossington said it would mean pedestrians could cross without having to wait for lights." Legally this is true, but it is little reassurance to many disabled pedestrians who are frail, walk with difficulty, have impaired sight or impaired hearing, and therefore have less confidence stepping out in front of traffic.

Blindfold yourself, wear earplugs, then dare to cross a zebra crossing in front of traffic you cannot see and canot properly hear. Remember that most of the motor vehicles using New Road are 'buses, which weigh about 20 Tonnes.

Craig Rossington and a small group of his colleagues are pursuing an Animal Farm style dotty dogma that says "zebra crossings good, puffin and pelican crossings bad". The current puffin is the right sort of crossing, but arguably in the wrong place to link Castle Street 'bus stops with Queen Street shops. The proposed zebra would be in the right place, but it would be the wrong sort of crossing.

Destruction of New Road's puffin crossing may increase casualties - but only because it is part of Transform Oxford's set of plans to wreck elderly and disabled people's access to and across the city centre, thus deterring many people from trying to visit or cross central Oxford. People won't have accidents in a place if you drive them away from visiting it!

Bolstered by last week's Conservative landslide, our arrogant County Council presses ahead with its dogma, heedless of whom it hurts. Welcome to Animal Farm!

Hugh Jaeger says...
11:08pm Thu 11 Jun 09

Sorry: in my last paragraph I meant to say "may not increase casualties". I apologise for any confusion.

Andrew:Oxford says...
11:13pm Thu 11 Jun 09

monachus wrote:
Just noticed this story. Sorry to disappoint everyone, but Rule 206 of the Highway Code clearly states that cars turning at a road junction must give way to pedestrians who are crossing.

No one has the 'right of way' in the Highway Code
Even the cyclists who are overtaking me whilst I'm waiting to turn right?

(Anyone know why my original comment appears 3 times on this story whilst it was only submitted once and appeared just the once earlier?)

Old zimner says...
3:56am Fri 12 Jun 09

Monachus. If you read the post I said PEDS who walk out in front of you, not who are already crossing before you make your manouvre

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree