News RSS Feed


Landlords face new fines


DODGY landlords have been warned they will face new fines under an Oxford City Council initiative.

The council’s executive board plans to charge £300 for issuing notices related to hazards in residential accommodation.

The council has previously not charged for the official improvement notices, which warn landlords they will be taken to court if they do not act to improve their properties.

It is hoped the new move will encourage landlords to act quickly if the council orders work to be carried out.

Executive member for housing Ed Turner said: “It’s an important part of our work to tackle bad landlords –– the minority who let down their tenants, and the wider community.

“People will be warned, but if they ignore the council's warnings, they must be prepared to face a legal notice and the financial penalty of £300, with the threat of prosecution if they continue to ignore us. I would encourage tenants concerned by the state of their property, and getting no joy from their landlord, to get in touch. The quality of privately rented housing in the city is a huge issue.”

Between April 2008 and March this year, the city council issued 35 notices ordering landlords to improve properties.

If the new charges had been in effect, it would have boosted council coffers by £10,000.

Housing officer Gail Siddall said: “The change will affect all landlords, but good landlords should respond and get the work sorted before a notice is served.”

In 2008, the city council received a record 1,600 complaints by tenants –– 200 more than the previous year –– for problems ranging from collapsed ceilings to rat infestations. It took 19 landlords to court. Some of the worst conditions were found in houses of multiple occupation (HMO) used by people referred by the council's housing department, social services, or rented by students. Landlady Joginder Dhanjal, 65, from Rose Hill, was fined more than £2,500 by Oxford magistrates in October last year for not maintaining a property in Donnington Bridge Road, East Oxford.

When officers visited the eight-bedroom house, for which Dhanjal charged £70 per week per tenant, they found a filthy kitchen, a condemned cooker unused for over a year, and tenants living without gas or heating.

Dhanjal claimed that she had not known what was expected of her.

But Ian Wright, the city council’s public health manager, said it was clear in the council's regulations what was required.

He said: “While the tenants have a responsibility to maintain the property to a certain degree, it is up to the manager of an HMO to keep the common parts of the property clean and safe.”

Mr Turner added: “Right now some of the most vulnerable people are getting housed in unhealthy and dangerous properties.”

tshepherd@oxfordmail.co.uk


Your Say YourOxford

Tom Daily, oxford says...
6:52pm Wed 27 May 09

Is this simply becoming more and more of a witch hunt against landlords and developers?

It seems a popular thing to do is hound the landlords, it helps during council elections. Fine them and it helps to boost council coffers.

Introduction of HMO licensing to the tune of almost £1000 per house is already putting a strain on the amount of already stretched rental accomodation and now yet another fine.
I can see all these charges and fines being passed on to tennants via less accomodation available and more demand.
By all means warn the landlords and then if no corrective measures have been taken then prosecute, but for goodness sake work with them not against them.
Stop treating the landlord as a public enemy.
If a member of the public needs advice on a planning proposal then they need to pay £200 for a pre application disscussion.
Sounds like stick a monetory cost on anything that moves in this sector.

EB, Oxford says...
8:48pm Wed 27 May 09

Tom there are a lot of landlords out there who really take the pi55. I have experience of a couple. One of which removed all the lightbulbs when the previous tenants moved out and made us buy new bulbs for the whole house.

Sadly some landlords don't want to play ball and will ignore regulations and then find any excuse to keep the deposit. Thankfully the govt have sorted this with the escrow system!

My security word is "they-hide", quite apt for some Oxford landlords. Mr Khan especially.

Tom Daily, oxford says...
10:21pm Wed 27 May 09

Well if we need to talk about pi55 takers, lets talk about some tenant's too shall we.
Tennant's who are always late with rental payments, cause huge damages, abuse properties, cause a rental backlog of 3 months and then do a runner, as this is usually how long it can take with the legal side of evictions.
Stop painting a picture where the landlord is the sole villain of the piece, tennants are just as bad.
Just ask anyone who's neighbour is a tennant and ask them!
As I say, fair play with keeping up standards, but lets help landlords against problemsome tennants and problemsome letting agents (Dr Andrew Fry and the problems he is having with the shifty Hussein bros. who run the Charles Lawson racquet). Lets have a more level playing field!

Comments are closed on this article.


Local Advertisers

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »