It’s viable but no cash for Eynsham Road cycle path (From Oxford Mail)
Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting OXFORD NEWS to 80360 or email us
It’s viable but no cash for B4044 Eynsham Road cycle path
6:00pm Friday 20th July 2012 in News
Members of the Bike Safe, including Ian Leggett, third from right, wait to join the traffic on the busy B4044 between Botley and Eynsham
THE campaign for a cycle path along one of Oxfordshire’s busiest roads is being stepped up, after a study showed the idea was viable.
Cyclists and pedestrians say the B4044 between Dean Court, Farmoor and Eynsham is winding, unlit and too narrow to allow a vehicle to overtake a bike against traffic .
Now a study from cycle lobby group Sustrans shows building a new ‘community path’ would solve the problem, but it would cost £800,000.
While the scheme is feasible Oxfordshire County Council spokesman Martin Crabtree warned there is no money in the pot to pay for it.
He said: “A lot of work has gone into pursuing ideas and we know there is enthusiasm for them locally. However there is very little funding so there is no possibility of the county council fully or even part-funding this scheme in the foreseeable future.”
Ian Leggett, from community group Bike Safe, which commissioned the study, said: “We looked at different options but the only real option for a variety of reasons was to create a dedicated off-road route.
“Anything else would be too dangerous because the road is simply too narrow.
“But hopefully this would be supported by motorists as it will ease traffic and cyclists could cycle without having a bus six inches off their back wheel.”
The study was funded by £6,250 won by the group in a national Natwest Community Force competition last year, when it collected a high number of public votes. It showed the path would be cost-effective on one side of the road rather than two and could be built in phases.
The two phases – from Eynsham to Farmoor and then from Farmoor to Botley the following year – would cost £400,000 each. Previous estimates put the cost at between £1m and £2m.
Mr Leggett said: “This would be an investment which would pay for itself in seven or eight years.
“This would make an incredible difference. If you live in Farmoor, you cannot walk anywhere because there are no pavements.
“You can’t walk even to the shops and you are isolated. It is a crazy situation.”
The findings of the study will be presented in a meeting at 7.30pm tonight at Farmoor Village Hall. The public are welcome.
Mr Leggett said: “We continue to need community support. The major thing we face is the council says it a good scheme but is not committed to delivering it.
“This will never happen without the community.”
Comments(9)
the wizard
says...
8:43pm Fri 20 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Not rocket science to read that line again,
"Cyclists and pedestrians say the B4044 between Dean Court, Farmoor and Eynsham is winding, unlit and too narrow to allow a vehicle to overtake a bike against traffic"..........
..........why's that a problem, it just means the traffic has to stay behind the cyclist until there's a gap, it's not rocket science.
"winding, unlit and too narrow"
On a winters day with rain and poor visibility, an unlit cyclist without a vest can be hard to see given the back drop of hedges etc.
The fear here is that before very long a fatality may occur, heaven forbid.
The recent re surfacing has helped cyclists keep in the the curb better but with the usage along this stretch an accident is inevitable given the present circumstances. Your analogy is somewhat misplaced
Dilligaf2010
says...
11:19pm Fri 20 Jul 12
the wizard wrote:"On a winters day with rain and poor visibility, an unlit cyclist without a vest can be hard to see"..........
Dilligaf2010 wrote:Not rocket science to read that line again,
"Cyclists and pedestrians say the B4044 between Dean Court, Farmoor and Eynsham is winding, unlit and too narrow to allow a vehicle to overtake a bike against traffic"..........
..........why's that a problem, it just means the traffic has to stay behind the cyclist until there's a gap, it's not rocket science.
"winding, unlit and too narrow"
On a winters day with rain and poor visibility, an unlit cyclist without a vest can be hard to see given the back drop of hedges etc.
The fear here is that before very long a fatality may occur, heaven forbid.
The recent re surfacing has helped cyclists keep in the the curb better but with the usage along this stretch an accident is inevitable given the present circumstances. Your analogy is somewhat misplaced
........Simple solution, cyclists should use lights, and wear suitable clothing.
xjohnx
says...
7:33am Sat 21 Jul 12
Cyclists don't need to use lights etc. They don't have to be considerate to others.
medicine man
says...
12:33pm Sat 21 Jul 12
xjohnx says,they don't have to be considerate to others.
38arnett
says...
10:34am Sun 22 Jul 12
You will arrive at your jouneys end exhausted by all that foot & arm excercise.
Medicine man & xjohnx = fools.
medicine man
says...
12:05pm Sun 22 Jul 12
First .I am not a fool .Second I am a Paramedic so unfortunately I have picked up my share of cyclists .Third .I don't have a problem with cyclists .My original point I was trying to make was.If there is a cycle track then why not use it ?
Further ,I have been an IAM member since 1985 .
38arnett
says...
6:47pm Sun 22 Jul 12
Cillawaugh
says...
11:11am Wed 25 Jul 12
Dilligaf2010 says...
8:07pm Fri 20 Jul 12
..........why's that a problem, it just means the traffic has to stay behind the cyclist until there's a gap, it's not rocket science.