News RSS Feed


House blaze in Cowley Road

House blaze in Cowley Road House blaze in Cowley Road

A HOUSE in Cowley Road is currently on fire, sending smoke billowing into the road.

Fire crews were called to the property near the Cowley Road Methodist Church at around 3.45pm.

They are currently still there battling the blaze.

A police spokesman confirmed Thames Valley officers were also in attendance.

Comments(25)

Lady Penelopee says...
4:56pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Why are the adjacent properties boarded up?

Joe Chapman says...
5:12pm Wed 15 Feb 12

They've been boarded up for some time. I walked past this house I think last week. I think the downstairs window was smashed, completely open and I could see shreds of curtains at the window. I'm not sure that anyone was living there.

Joe Chapman says...
5:13pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Buses and other traffic have also been re-routed. This may have changed now though.

Dilligaf2010 says...
6:13pm Wed 15 Feb 12

I don't suppose there's a planning application to demolish pending is there?

brained assassin says...
7:11pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
I don't suppose there's a planning application to demolish pending is there?
Why would you want to demolish these buildings?! They could be so beautiful if they were just properly maintained.

Dilligaf2010 says...
7:50pm Wed 15 Feb 12

brained assassin wrote:
Dilligaf2010 wrote:
I don't suppose there's a planning application to demolish pending is there?
Why would you want to demolish these buildings?! They could be so beautiful if they were just properly maintained.
I wouldn't, I'd rather see old buildings restored, but developers think differently, so a fire would be beneficial to them.

kikkamaria says...
8:14pm Wed 15 Feb 12

The house was actually occupied by squatters, (several homeless people seen around Cowley Road). The owner was processing the papers to get them evicted because they had presented their squatting rights. - The police say they couldn't evict them as they were not seen as a threat to the safety of those in the area - I'm sure!

Danny A says...
9:35pm Wed 15 Feb 12

It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.

Andrew:Oxford says...
9:50pm Wed 15 Feb 12

kikkamaria wrote:
The house was actually occupied by squatters, (several homeless people seen around Cowley Road). The owner was processing the papers to get them evicted because they had presented their squatting rights. - The police say they couldn't evict them as they were not seen as a threat to the safety of those in the area - I'm sure!
Do squatters "rights" over-ride the local by-laws on HMOs?

mrploppy says...
11:14pm Wed 15 Feb 12

Andrew:Oxford wrote:
kikkamaria wrote:
The house was actually occupied by squatters, (several homeless people seen around Cowley Road). The owner was processing the papers to get them evicted because they had presented their squatting rights. - The police say they couldn't evict them as they were not seen as a threat to the safety of those in the area - I'm sure!
Do squatters "rights" over-ride the local by-laws on HMOs?
If they were renting then yes. A crucial point I fear you overlooked.

Lady Penelopee says...
9:46am Thu 16 Feb 12

Danny A wrote:
It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.
Why would Landlords intentionally leave properties empty?

They'd have to pay 90% council tax at the very least.

Perhaps they were building up funds to restore the building?

Dilligaf2010 says...
10:53am Thu 16 Feb 12

Lady Penelopee wrote:
Danny A wrote:
It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.
Why would Landlords intentionally leave properties empty?

They'd have to pay 90% council tax at the very least.

Perhaps they were building up funds to restore the building?
That's a question that's being asked all over the Country, there are hundreds of thousand empty properties, it beggars belief considering how many homeless there are.

The Big Issue says...
11:44am Thu 16 Feb 12

Dilligaf2010 wrote:
I don't suppose there's a planning application to demolish pending is there?
That happens to derelict pubs and other buildings where planning consent is refused:I'm wondering if the police see the link?
Not fussed whether there are any squatters inside, saves paying for drug rehab..

Dilligaf2010 says...
11:52am Thu 16 Feb 12

The Big Issue wrote:
Dilligaf2010 wrote:
I don't suppose there's a planning application to demolish pending is there?
That happens to derelict pubs and other buildings where planning consent is refused:I'm wondering if the police see the link?
Not fussed whether there are any squatters inside, saves paying for drug rehab..
I believe police are now investigating this fire, so maybe they do

Lady Penelopee says...
3:30pm Thu 16 Feb 12

Lady Penelopee wrote:
Danny A wrote: It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.
Why would Landlords intentionally leave properties empty? They'd have to pay 90% council tax at the very least. Perhaps they were building up funds to restore the building?
Actually, I know someone with an empty house. He can't let it out as he doesn't have enough equity for a BTL mortgage and lender won't give consent, so is selling it instead (he's re-located for work), but this is taking ages as sales keep falling through due to mortgages being pulled or conditions being changed. It's been empty about 8 months now.

xjohnx says...
6:54pm Thu 16 Feb 12

In my experiance as a landlord, its problems with getting BTL mortgages or landlords insurance or both (ever wondered why you can't have a dog in private rentals, for instance). Renting an empty property is the best way to make sure its not squatted. Sometimes properties are left empty because the authorities take ages giving planning permission, also the cost of refurbishment can be prohibitive.
Almost nobody deliberately leaves empty property unrented without good reason.

Darkforbid says...
7:57pm Thu 16 Feb 12

┄Almost nobody deliberately
leaves empty property
unrented without good
reason.┄

however lots do, theres loads in this city.

Anyway seems like the police are holding Bernard, in connection with this, but he was at the Steppin' Stones centre, so letting him go would be a good idea

virgotae73 says...
11:09am Fri 17 Feb 12

They pick on the people they know, as Bernard is known to them and was seen in the house they think it must have been him!!!!! God forbid it was an accident hey????

LORD PETE MCVAY. OX2 6EG says...
10:54pm Fri 17 Feb 12

Danny A wrote:
It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.
Another brainless quote. It is up to the owner of a property to do as he wishes as long as he is within the law. What has is got to do with you what a person does with his own property?

kikkamaria says...
11:40pm Fri 17 Feb 12

xjohnx wrote:
In my experiance as a landlord, its problems with getting BTL mortgages or landlords insurance or both (ever wondered why you can't have a dog in private rentals, for instance). Renting an empty property is the best way to make sure its not squatted. Sometimes properties are left empty because the authorities take ages giving planning permission, also the cost of refurbishment can be prohibitive.
Almost nobody deliberately leaves empty property unrented without good reason.
exactly!this is not the first time there have been squatters in the house, maybe the landlord was waiting for the insurance from the last time they ruined the house. I'm imagining Bernard is the homeless man always on Cowley Road, who was squatting there?

simplicissimus says...
5:16am Sat 18 Feb 12

Danny A wrote:
It's far too cheap and easy for landlords to leave properties empty in this country. There should be a significant financial burden placed on landlords in prime locations to ensure that no property is wasted.
Squatting rights are the bigger problem, so thank heavens the Tories will make squatting the criminal offense it should be.

Stalinists, of course, oppose the idea of personal property, but love giving the State ever more intrusive control over and into free individuals' lives.

The smaller the role played by government in the life of a nation, the healthier will be that nation, and ours is pretty ill after 13 years of the last shower.

Cowley Rd. currently encapsulates much of what is wrong in Oxford, and crime levels are shocking. It could be cleaner and safer.

The police must be having a laugh. Was this arson?

simplicissimus says...
5:21am Sat 18 Feb 12

mrploppy wrote:
Andrew:Oxford wrote:
kikkamaria wrote:
The house was actually occupied by squatters, (several homeless people seen around Cowley Road). The owner was processing the papers to get them evicted because they had presented their squatting rights. - The police say they couldn't evict them as they were not seen as a threat to the safety of those in the area - I'm sure!
Do squatters "rights" over-ride the local by-laws on HMOs?
If they were renting then yes. A crucial point I fear you overlooked.
Don't understand you, Ploppy. If squatting, they're not renting.

Now that there's been a fire, has TVP or the fire service ruled out arson? Negligence? Fire is a threat o the safety of those in the area, after all.

kikkamaria says...
3:39pm Sat 18 Feb 12

it was arson

sparky123456 says...
1:46pm Mon 20 Feb 12

bernard. who the hells bernard?! in my opinion that row needs to be turned in to some affordable 1 and 2 bed flats with a few parking spaces. maybe that will happen now.

SteveOX4 says...
6:32pm Mon 20 Feb 12

sparky123456 wrote:
bernard. who the hells bernard?! in my opinion that row needs to be turned in to some affordable 1 and 2 bed flats with a few parking spaces. maybe that will happen now.
"Bernard Day, 39, of James Street, Oxford, admitted three counts of begging in public in Cowley Road on November 26, December 11 and January 6. Given an 18-month conditional discharge and told to pay £85 costs. "

From February 2011.

click2find

Most popular


About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree